|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: |
National Cancer Institute (NCI) |
| Information provided by (Responsible Party): | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00948129 |
Purpose
The goal of this study is to learn which of 3 methods is best for helping people quit smoking.
Objectives:
Specific Aim 1: Specific Aim 1: Compare the efficacy of three smoking cessation interventions targeting community based low-income uninsured and underinsured individuals in a group-randomized trial. The interventions will include a Standard Care (SC) approach, consisting of brief advice to quit smoking, nicotine replace therapy (NRT), and self-help written materials; an Enhanced Care (EC) approach, consisting of the standard care components and a cell phone-delivered text/graphical messaging component; and an Intensive Care (IC) approach, consisting of all SC and EC components plus a series of 11 cell phone-delivered proactive counseling sessions and a cell phone-delivered text/graphical messaging component.
Hypothesis 1.1. Participants randomized to the EC condition will have higher smoking abstinence rates at 12-month follow-up compared to participants randomized to the SC condition.
Hypothesis 1.2. Participants randomized to the IC condition will have higher smoking abstinence rates at 12-month follow-up compared to participants randomized to the EC condition.
Specific Aim 2: Evaluate the role of quit motivation, nicotine withdrawal, risk perception, self-efficacy, social support, and negative affect as potential mediators of smoking abstinence
Hypothesis 2.1: The EC's and IC's effects on abstinence will be mediated by quit motivation, nicotine withdrawal, risk perception, self-efficacy, social support, and negative affect.
Specific Aim 3: Compare the cost-effectiveness of the three treatment conditions.
Hypothesis 3.1: Compared to SC and EC, the IC is a cost-effective use of health care resources.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Smoking Cessation Smoking |
Behavioral: Smoking cessation training, support, and telephone follow-up Behavioral: Smoking cessation intervention Behavioral: Weekly Telephone Coaching |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Enhancing Cancer Outreach for Low-income Adults With Innovative Smoking Cessation |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 756 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2010 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Standard Care
Group 1 - Standard Care (SC) approach
|
Behavioral: Smoking cessation training, support, and telephone follow-up
Brief coach advice to quit smoking, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and self-help written materials
|
|
Experimental: Enhanced Care
Group 2 - Enhanced Care (EC) approach
|
Behavioral: Smoking cessation training, support, and telephone follow-up
Brief coach advice to quit smoking, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and self-help written materials
Behavioral: Smoking cessation intervention
SC components plus a single motivational interviewing counseling session and a cell phone-delivered text/graphical messaging component
|
|
Experimental: Intensive Care
Group 3 - Intensive Care (IC) approach
|
Behavioral: Smoking cessation training, support, and telephone follow-up
Brief coach advice to quit smoking, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and self-help written materials
Behavioral: Smoking cessation intervention
SC components plus a single motivational interviewing counseling session and a cell phone-delivered text/graphical messaging component
Behavioral: Weekly Telephone Coaching
SC and EC components plus a series of 11 cell phone-delivered proactive counseling sessions and a cell phone-delivered text/graphical messaging component
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Alex Prokhorov, MD, PHD | 20090336@mdanderson.org |
| United States, Texas | |
| UT MD Anderson Cancer Center | Recruiting |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| Principal Investigator: Alex Prokhorov, MD, PHD | |
| Study Chair: | Alex Prokhorov, MD, PHD | UT MD Anderson Cancer Center |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00948129 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2009-0336 |
| Study First Received: | July 14, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | April 24, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
Smoking Cessation Low-Income Cigarette smoking Uninsured and underinsured |
NRT Nicoderm CQ Habits |
|
Smoking Habits |