|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | University of California, Irvine |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | University of California, Irvine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00937924 |
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare meperidine/midazolam with diphenhydramine, meperidine/midazolam with promethazine, and meperidine/midazolam with placebo as sedation methods. The investigators are interested to see whether adjunct sedatives (diphenhydramine and promethazine) will improve sedation.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) |
Drug: Saline Drug: Diphenhydramine Drug: Promethazine |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Promethazine and Diphenhydramine as Adjunct Sedatives for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 465 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2008 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: 1
Control. Normal Saline Injections.
|
Drug: Saline
Saline solution injections
|
|
Experimental: 2
Diphenhydramine injections given as adjunct sedative.
|
Drug: Diphenhydramine
Diphenhydramine injections
|
|
Experimental: 3
Promethazine given as an adjunct sedative.
|
Drug: Promethazine
Promethazine
|
Comparing sedation techniques during invasive endoscopic procedures such as ERCP and EUS is a relatively unexplored area of clinical research. In particular, the effectiveness of adjunct sedatives such as diphenhydramine and promethazine during ERCP/EUS procedures has not been studied. Achieving a moderate sedation level may be ideal for ERCP/EUS procedures in order to provide adequate patient comfort, amnesia, and completion of intended endoscopic procedures. The relevance of further studies in this area is apparent. In terms of clinical practice; over-sedation can lead to decreased airway protection, longer post-procedural recovery times, and unnecessary drug cost; under-sedation can lead to patient anxiety, agitation, recall, and longer procedural time.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Venkataraman Muthusamy, MD | 714 456-5765 | raman@uci.edu |
| Contact: Swapna Reddy, MD | sbreddy@uci.edu |
| United States, California | |
| H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center | Recruiting |
| Orange, California, United States, 92868 | |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Dr. Venkataraman Muthusamy, Department of Gastroenterology |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00937924 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HS 2007-5810 |
| Study First Received: | June 4, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | February 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
EUS ERCP Sedation Level Adverse Symptoms Recovery time |
|
Diphenhydramine Promethazine Hypnotics and Sedatives Antiemetics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Gastrointestinal Agents Histamine H1 Antagonists |
Histamine Antagonists Histamine Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Central Nervous System Depressants Anti-Allergic Agents Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Sensory System Agents Antipruritics Dermatologic Agents |