Knee Muscle Force Recovery After Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Total Knee Replacement (TKR) (MISTKR)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To compare muscle torque recovery between patients under subvastus approach and those under midvastus approach after total knee replacement
| Condition |
|---|
|
Total Knee Replacement Approach Muscle Torque |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Retrospective |
| Official Title: | Outcome and Benefit After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Natural History of Muscle Power Recovery and Difference Between Different Surgical Approach |
| Enrollment: | 30 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2004 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2004 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
subvastus approach/ midvastus approach
subvastus: vastus medialis oblique was not cut during operation midvastus: vastus medialis oblique was cut during operation
|
|
Cybex
Knee extension/ flexion isometric and isokinetic performance of all cases were tested using Cybex
|
Detailed Description:
Total knee Arthroplasty is a common operated surgery in each hospitals, and a lots of patients benefit from this surgery. Traditionally the frequently used surgical approach is parapatellar approach. However, recently the subvastus and midvastus approach has gained a world-wide population. These two methods had less damage to the quadriceps tendon and theoretically should have better post-operative muscle power recovery, less lateral retinaculum release because of better patellar tracking. The only differences between these two approaches are that the midvastus approach will split the vastus medialis muscle and denervation may occur. In this study we will use HSS or KSS functional score and Cybex dynamometer to evaluate the functional recovery, and use Merchant's view radiography to evaluate the result of patellar tracking. The follow-up period will not be limited and we will use mixed-model statistic's random effect to gain the natural history of muscle power recovery, which will become the base of other study. We can also compare the difference of results between PS type and CR type and different surgical approach. The natural history of the knee score will also be obtained.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Patients after total knee replacement without severe systemic disorders
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients after subvastus approach or midvastus approach total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with severe hypertension, heart disease or other problems which negatively influence the security of muscle test
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr. Chih-Hung Chang, Head of Division of Orthopedics, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00912769 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 97025, 97025 |
| Study First Received: | June 2, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | June 2, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital:
|
Total knee replacement Subvastus Midvastus Isokinetic Quadriceps |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 13, 2013