A Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by:
Endo Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00904020
First received: May 15, 2009
Last updated: February 12, 2010
Last verified: February 2010
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Patients with a diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), diabetic neuropathy (DN), or low back pain (LBP) who were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of Lidoderm® administered once daily (q24h) after 14 day in the treatment of PHN, DN, or LBP in patients who had a partial response to a regimen containing gabapentin.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Postherpetic Neuralgia Diabetic Neuropathy Low Back Pain |
Drug: Lidoderm |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Endo Pharmaceuticals:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Average daily pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6) [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Pain quality using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Investigator and Patient Global Impression of Change [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Extent of numbness at the site of pain using the Numbness Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Patient Global Assessment of Pain Relief [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Safety assessments included Adverse Events (AE), discontinuation due to AEs, physical and neurological examination results, vital signs, clinical laboratory data, sensory testing, numbness testing, and dermal assessments [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- QoL: Pain interference (BPI Question 9) [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- QoL: Patient Global Assessment of Patch Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 107 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2002 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2002 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: (1) Lidoderm
(1) Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.
|
Drug: Lidoderm
Patients participated in a 2-week treatment period. Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.
Other Name: Lidocaine patach 5%
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin
- Had been on a stable dose of gabapentin for at least 14 days (same dose ±10% for 14 days)
- Had a partial response to a gabapentin-containing analgesic regimen defined as an average daily pain intensity score of >4 on a ) to 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bas as the patients have ever imagined (Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] within 24 hours prior to the screening visit
- For diabetic patients, had a hemoglobin A1c level <0.13 (normal range, 0.047-0.064)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had a neurological condition other than that associated with their pain diagnosis that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with their ability to participate in the study
- Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 14 days prior to study entry
- Had received trigger point injections within 14 days prior to study entry
- Had received Botox injections within 3 months prior to study entry
- Were taking a lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued while receiving Lidoderm
- Were taking Class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., mexiletine, tocainide)
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00904020
Locations
| United States, Alabama | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States | |
| United States, Arizona | |
| Phoenix, Arizona, United States | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Plantation, Florida, United States | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Marietta, Georgia, United States | |
| United States, Illinois | |
| Burr Ridge, Illinois, United States | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| Overland Park, Kansas, United States | |
| United States, New Jersey | |
| Hackensack, New Jersey, United States | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| Cudahy, Wisconsin, United States | |
| Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States | |
| West Bend, Wisconsin, United States | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
| Study Director: | Study Director | Endo Pharmaceuticals |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Sr. Director, Clinical R&D, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00904020 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | EN3220-008 |
| Study First Received: | May 15, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | February 12, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Back Pain Diabetic Neuropathies Low Back Pain Neuralgia Neuralgia, Postherpetic Demyelinating Diseases Polyneuropathies Nerve Compression Syndromes Neurologic Manifestations Neurotoxicity Syndromes Pain Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases |
Diabetes Complications Diabetes Mellitus Endocrine System Diseases Poisoning Substance-Related Disorders Lidocaine Anesthetics, Local Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013