Thoracic Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Aneurysm of the Descending Thoracic Aortic
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To assess the safety and efficacy of the GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis in the primary treatment of aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA)
> Primary Hypothesis: The proportion of subjects free from a major device event through 1 month post-treatment will not be significantly less than 0.95, which represents the proportion observed in previous clinical studies with the GORE TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Aneurysm |
Device: GORE CTAG Device |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | An Evaluation of the GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis for the Primary Treatment of Aneurysm of the Descending Thoracic Aortic |
- The Number of Subjects Free From a Major Device Event Through 1 Month Post-treatment [ Time Frame: Treatment through 1 month post treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- The Number of Subjects Experiencing a Serious Adverse Event Through One Month Post Treatment. [ Time Frame: Treatment through 1 month post procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Procedure Time [ Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total time required for surgical device implantation (recorded in minutes).
- Operative Blood Loss [ Time Frame: Initial Device Implant Procedure During Index Hospitalization ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Convalescence Stay in an Intensive Care Unit [ Time Frame: During the Index Hospitalization ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Total Length of Hospital Stay [ Time Frame: Total Duration of the Index Hospitalization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Time to Return to Normal Daily Activities [ Time Frame: Average time of one month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]This is the self reported time that the subject returned to pre-operative activities and is not a time to event analysis.
| Enrollment: | 51 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2015 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: GORE CTAG Device
The primary endpoint of this study is freedom from a Major Device Event (MDE) through 1 month post-treatment in subjects treated with the GORE® Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis.
|
Device: GORE CTAG Device
Endovascular aortic stent-graft
Other Name: GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Presence of DTA aneurysm deemed to warrant surgical repair
>
- Fusiform (≥50 mm), or >
- Saccular (no diameter criteria)
Subject is > 21 years of age
>
Proximal and distal landing zone length ≥ 2.0 cm
- Landing zones must be in native aorta
- Landing zone may include left subclavian artery, if necessary
All proximal and distal landing zone inner diameters are between 16-42 mm
>
• Diameter assessed by flow lumen and thrombus, if present; calcium excluded
>
Life expectancy > 2 years
>
- Able to tolerate thoracotomy >
- Male or infertile female >
Able to comply with protocol requirements including following-up
>
Signed informed consent
>
>
>
Exclusion Criteria:
- Differing proximal and distal neck diameters (aortic taper) outside the intended aortic diameter requirements (sizing guide) for a single endoprosthesis diameter and the inability to use devices of different diameters (in adherence to the sizing guide) to compensate for the taper >
- Tortuous or stenotic iliac and/or femoral arteries and inability to use a conduit for vascular access >
Aneurysmal, dissected, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed landing zone(s)
>
Mycotic aneurysm
>
Hemodynamically unstable aneurysm rupture
>
Aortic dissection
>
Planned coverage of left carotid or celiac arteries with the CTAG Device
>
Planned concomitant surgical procedure (other than left subclavian transposition and wireless sac pressure monitoring), or major surgery within 30 days of treatment date
>
Known degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g. Marfan or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome
>
Known history of drug abuse
>
ASA risk classification = V (moribund patient not expected to live 24 hours with or without operation)
>
NYHA class IV
>
Participating in another investigational device or drug study within 1 year of treatment
>
Subject has known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
>
- Subject has a systemic infection and may be at increased risk of endovascular graft infection >
Contacts and Locations| United States, Alabama | |
| University of Alabama Medical Center | |
| Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294 | |
| Principal Investigator: | William D Jordan, Dr. | University of Alabama at Birmingham |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | W.L.Gore & Associates |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00874250 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TAG 08-03 |
| Study First Received: | March 31, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | September 22, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | February 12, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Aneurysm Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013