Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Dystonia (STN DBS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN)for primary dystonia.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Dystonia |
Device: Medtronic implantable deep brain stimulation (DBS) system |
Phase 1 Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Patients With Dystonia |
- The primary outcome measure is the change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) movement score from baseline to 12 months. [ Time Frame: 36 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 25 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2008 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
-
Device: Medtronic implantable deep brain stimulation (DBS) system
Dystonia is an uncommon brain disorder in which there is abnormal muscle tone producing twisting, writhing movements and abnormal postures. It is associated with abnormal electrical activity in two groups of nerve cells in the brain called the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to be an effective treatment in patients with medically refractory dystonia and is currently approved for both the GPi and STN targets under a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) for use in segmental and generalized primary dystonia as well as focal cervical dystonia. GPi DBS appears to be effective for medication-refractory focal and segmental dystonia affecting the cranial and cervical regions in open-label series, but recently GPi stimulation has been associated with subtle motor disturbances in previously non-dystonic body regions (i.e., arms and legs) in this population of patients. DBS of the STN has also been reported to be effective for treating generalized and cervical dystonia in small open label trials. STN DBS for cranial and cervical regions may provide similar efficacy in the treatment of dystonia as GPi DBS, but without unwanted stimulation-induced motor effects. Objectives of this study are to 1) evaluate the safety and efficacy of STN DBS for dystonia; 2) determine the time course of STN potential efficacy and optimal stimulation parameters; and 3) determine the frequency and severity of stimulation-induced motor adverse effects in previously non-dystonic body regions. Twenty-five patients will be screened, consented, and enrolled in this study. All patients will undergo bilateral STN DBS for dystonia. Participants will be evaluated pre- and postoperatively with standard dystonia rating scales including the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS), Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS), and Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) rating scale. Changes in cognitive function will be assessed with neuropsychological testing. Stimulation parameters will be documented, and a patient questionnaire will be administered postoperatively to determine if patients are experiencing stimulation-induced motor adverse effects. Patient weight will be recorded at study visits. This pilot study will provide preliminary open label efficacy outcomes for STN DBS in the treatment of primary dystonia and will help determine if this target should be compared to GPi DBS in a larger double-blind trial.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 7 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Refractory primary dystonia diagnosed by a movement disorders neurologist
- Severe functional impairment despite optimal medical management, including failed botulinum toxin therapy
- Age 7-80 years (UCSF patients) and 18-80 (VA patients)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients considered at high risk for elective neurosurgery because of co-morbid conditions
- Brain MRI showing extensive brain atrophy or small vessel ischemic disease
- Pregnancy
- Inability to tolerate awake microelectrode-guided neurosurgery
- Inability to follow up with post-operative study visits
- Inability to speak or read English
- Patients with a score of 4.5 or lower on the BFMDRS movement scale
- Patients with Secondary dystonia
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Leslie Markun, B.A. | 415-353-8328 | Leslie.Markun@ucsfmedctr.org |
| Contact: Monica Volz, M.S.N. | 415-353-7382 | monica.volz@ucsf.edu |
| United States, California | |
| University of California, San Francisco | Recruiting |
| San Francisco, California, United States, 94143 | |
| Contact: Leslie Markun, B.A. 415-353-8328 Leslie.Markun@ucsfmedctr.org | |
| San Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Center | Recruiting |
| San Francisco, California, United States, 94121 | |
| Contact: Susan Heath, M.S.N. 415-221-4810 ext 2505 Susan.Heath@va.gov | |
| Contact: Elaine Lanier, M.S.N. 415-221-4810 ext 2488 Elaine.Lanier@va.gov | |
| Principal Investigator: | Jill Ostrem, M.D. | University of California, San Francisco |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University of California, San Francisco |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00773604 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Private donor |
| Study First Received: | October 7, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | May 16, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco:
|
blepharospasm Deep brain Stimulation cervical dystonia cranial dystonia |
generalized dystonia subthalamic nucleus DBS |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Dystonia Dystonic Disorders Dyskinesias Neurologic Manifestations |
Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Movement Disorders Central Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013