Clinical Study to Examine Brushing on Dental Implants
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The efficacy of two dentifrices in controlling gingivitis and plaque in adults with implants
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Gingival Diseases |
Drug: Fluoride Drug: Triclosan, fluoride |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Clinical Study to Examine Brushing on Dental Implants |
- Mombelli Plaque Index (mPI) for Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Modified Plaque Index (mPI)is a Dental plaque scale as follows 0 = No plaque,
1 = Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin;2 = Plaque can be seen by naked eye.3 = Abundance of soft matter. The lower the number the less plaque is present on the tooth.
- Mombelli Plaque Index (mPI) for Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Modified Plaque Index (mPI) is a Dental plaque scale as follows 0 = No plaque,
1 = Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin;2 = Plaque can be seen by naked eye.3 = Abundance of soft matter. The lower the number the less plaque is present on the tooth.
- Mombelli Plaque Index (mPI) for Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Modified Plaque Index (mPI) is a dental plaque scale as follows 0 = No plaque,
1 = Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin;2 = Plaque can be seen by naked eye.3 = Abundance of soft matter. The lower the number the less plaque is present on the tooth.
- Mombelli Plaque Index (mPI) for Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Modified Plaque Index (mPI) is a dental plaque scale as follows 0 = No plaque,
1 = Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin;2 = Plaque can be seen by naked eye.3 = Abundance of soft matter. The lower the number the less plaque is present on the tooth.
- Löe-Silness Gingival Index Score (GI) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingivitis score(GI) is defined: 0 = Absence of inflammation,1 = Mild inflammation-slight change in color and little change in texture,2 = Moderate inflammation-moderate glazing,redness,edema & hypertrophy,3 = Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy tendency for spontaneous bleeding. Each tooth is scored on 6 surfaces:mesio-facial;2)mid-facial;3)disto-facial;4)mesio-lingual;5)mid-lingualand 6)disto-lingual. A whole mouth score = adding all the GI scores & dividing by the total of number of sites scored. 3rd molars and teeth with restorations or crowns will be excluded.
- Löe-Silness Gingival Index Score (GI) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingivitis score(GI) is defined: 0 = Absence of inflammation,1 = Mild inflammation-slight change in color and little change in texture,2 = Moderate inflammation-moderate glazing,redness,edema & hypertrophy,3 = Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy tendency for spontaneous bleeding.Each tooth is scored on 6 surfaces:mesio-facial;2)mid-facial;3)disto-facial;4)mesio-lingual;5)mid-lingualand 6)disto-lingual. A whole mouth score = adding all the GI scores & dividing by the total of number of sites scored. 3rd molars and teeth with restorations or crowns will be excluded.
- Löe-Silness Gingival Index Score (GI)- Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingivitis Score (GI) is defined: 0 = Absence of inflammation,1=Mild inflammation-slight change in color and little change in texture,2 = Moderate inflammation-moderate glazing,redness,edema & hypertrophy,3 = Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy tendency for spontaneous bleeding. Each tooth is scored on 6 surfaces:mesio-facial;2)mid-facial;3)disto-facial;4)mesio-lingual;5)mid-lingualand 6)disto-lingual. A whole mouth score=adding all the GI scores & dividing by the total of number of sites scored. 3rd molars and teeth with restorations or crowns will be excluded.
- Löe-Silness Gingival Index Score (GI)- Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingivitis Score (GI) is defined: 0 = Absence of inflammation,1 = Mild inflammation-slight change in color and little change in texture,2 = Moderate inflammation-moderate glazing,redness,edema & hypertrophy,3 = Severe inflammation-marked redness and hypertrophy tendency for spontaneous bleeding. Each tooth is scored on 6 surfaces:mesio-facial;2)mid-facial;3)disto-facial;4)mesio-lingual;5)mid-lingualand 6)disto-lingual. A whole mouth score=adding all the GI scores & dividing by the total of number of sites scored. 3rd molars and teeth with restorations or crowns will be excluded.
- Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) Using Sulcus Bleeding Index for Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sulcus bleeding index for teeth is explained here. Gums around teeth are scored:0 = gingiva of normal texture & color, no bleeding;1 = gingiva normal, bleeds on probing;2 = bleeding on probing,change in color, no oedema; 3 = bleeding on probing,change in color, slight oedema;4 = bleeding on probing, change in color, obvious oedema;5=bleeding on probing, spontaneous bleeding, change in color, marked oedema.
- Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) Using Sulcus Bleeding Index for Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sulcus bleeding index for teeth is explained here. Gums around teeth are scored:0 = gingiva of normal texture & color, no bleeding;1 = gingiva normal, bleeds on probing;2 = bleeding on probing,change in color, no oedema;3 = bleeding on probing,change in color, slight oedema;4 = bleeding on probing,change in color, obvious oedema;5 = bleeding on probing, spontaneous bleeding,change in color,marked oedema.
- Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) Using the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index for Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingival bleeding on probing (BOP) using the modified sulcus bleeding index for implants. Scale equals 0 = No bleeding when periodontal probe is passed along the gingival margin;1 = Isolated bleeding spots visible;2 = Blood forms a confluent red line on the gingival margin;3 = Heavy or profuse bleeding.
- Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) Using the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index for Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Gingival bleeding on probing (BOP) using the modified sulcus bleeding index for implants. Scale equals 0 = No bleeding when periodontal probe is passed along the gingival margin;1 = Isolated bleeding spots visible;2 = Blood forms a confluent red line on the gingival margin;3 = Heavy or profuse bleeding.
- A.Actinomycetemcomitans (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are Least means square (LSM)determined by baseline adjusted means including Standard Error of means (SEM).
- A.Actinomycetemcomitans (DNA Probe Analysis)- Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data point is Least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including Standard Error of Means (SEM).
- A.Actinomycetemcomitans (DNA Probe Analysis)- Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implant. Data point is Least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including Standard Error of Means (SEM).
- A.Actinomycetemcomitans (DNA Probe Analysis)- Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implant. Data point is Least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including Standard Error of Means (SEM).
- C.Rectus (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- C.Rectus (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- C.Rectus (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- C.Rectus (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Capnocytophaga sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Capnocytophaga sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Capnocytophaga sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Capnocytophaga sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Corrodens (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Corrodens (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Corrodens (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Corrodens (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Saburreum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Saburreum (DNA Probe Analysis)- Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM)detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Saburreum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- E.Saburreum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implant [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- F.Nucleatum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- F.Nucleatum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM)
- F.Nucleatum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- F.Nucleatum (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM)determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Neissera sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Neissera sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points least means square (LSM) determined by baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Neissera sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Neissera sp. (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Gingivalis (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM)
- P.Gingivalis (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM)
- P.Gingivalis (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM)
- P.Gingivalis (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM)
- P.Intermedia (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Intermedia (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Intermedia (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Intermedia (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Melaninogenica (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Melaninogenica (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for both natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Melaninogenica (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- P.Melaninogenica (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Solobacterium (S.Moorei)(DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Solobacterium (S.Moorei)(DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error (SEM).
- Solobacterium (S.Moorei)(DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Solobacterium (S.Moorei)(DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Streptococci (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means )SEM).
- Streptococci (DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Streptococci (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means )SEM).
- Streptococci (DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means )SEM).
- T.Forsythia (DNA Probe Analysis)- Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for both natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- T.Forsythia (DNA Probe Analysis)-Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- T.Forsythia (DNA Probe Analysis)- Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for both Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- T.Forsythia (DNA Probe Analysis)- Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for both Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error of means (SEM).
- Veillonella sp.(DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error (SEM)
- Veillonella sp.(DNA Probe Analysis) - Natural Teeth [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for natural teeth. Data points are least means square (LSM) determined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error (SEM).
- Veillonella sp.(DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error (SEM)
- Veillonella sp.(DNA Probe Analysis) - Dental Implants [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]14 microorganisms were identified via DNA probe analysis for Dental Implants. Data points are least means square (LSM) detemined by using baseline adjusted means including standard error (SEM)
| Enrollment: | 105 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: A -
fluoride toothpaste (Ultrabrite)
|
Drug: Fluoride
Brush twice daily
Other Name: Ultrabrite toothpaste
|
|
Active Comparator: B - Postive control
fluoride/triclosan/copolymer toothpaste
|
Drug: Triclosan, fluoride
Brush twice daily
Other Name: Total toothpaste
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 76 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and females in good oral and general health aged 18 to 76 years.
- A willingness to read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent Form after the nature of the study has been fully explained to them. Subject should demonstrate willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for duration of study.
- Subjects will use the provided test articles and discontinue the use of other dentifrices and mouthrinses for the duration of the study.
- A minimum of 20 natural teeth with facial and lingual scorable surfaces. Teeth that are grossly carious, fully crowned or extensively restored on facial and/or lingual surfaces, orthodontically banded, abutments, or third molars will not be included in the tooth count.
- Adequate oral hygiene and no signs of oral neglect.
- Subjects will have at least one dental implant and a contralateral natural tooth.
- At the first visit subjects will be examined by a dentist for periodontal health.
- Selected subjects will have periodontal pockets less than 6mm.
- Subjects with gingival index equal to or greater than 1.0 and plaque index equal to or greater than or 1. 5 on the implant tooth will be enrolled. Gingival and plaque indices will be measured during the first visit for the implant. Similarly, these clinical indices (Gingival and plaque index) will be determined for the contralateral natural tooth. (The adjacent teeth will serve as a backup for the studies if control tooth is lost during study).
- Subjects who are habitual users of Colgate Total or other oral hygiene formulations with antimicrobial agents will complete a washout phase of 30 days with a commercial fluoride dentifrice prior to enrollment in the study. This washout dentifrice will be identified and obtained by the clinical investigator from an appropriate local source.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of significant adverse effects following use of oral hygiene products such as toothpastes and mouthrinses. Allergy to personal care/consumer products or their ingredients.
- Regular use of mouthwash with antimicrobial agents within the past month.
- History of diabetes or hepatic or renal disease, or other serious medical conditions or transmittable diseases, e.g. heart disease or AIDS.
- History of hepatitis, rheumatic fever, pacemaker, or prosthetic heart valves, heart murmur, mitral valve prolapse or other conditions requiring prophylactic antibiotic coverage prior to invasive dental procedures.
- Subjects presenting significant medical conditions or need for long term drug therapy.
- Subjects on antibiotic, anti inflammatory or anticoagulant therapy during the month preceding the baseline exam.
- Significant oral soft tissue pathology, systemically related gingival enlargement, severe gingivitis (based on a visual examinations) that would interfere with the study.
- History of active severe periodontal disease with bleeding gums and loose teeth.
- Widespread caries or chronic neglect. Subjects presenting with gross dental caries, severe generalized cervical abrasion and/or enamel abrasion, and large fractured or temporary restorations (based on visual examinations).
- Fixed or removable orthodontic appliance or removable partial dentures.
- Participation in any clinical study including dental plaque/gingivitis clinical trial involving oral care products, within the last 30 days. History of dental prophylaxis or treatments in the month preceding the start of study.
- Self reported pregnancy or lactation.
- History or current use of objects to pierce the lips or tongue.
- Subjects known to be an alcoholic, or a recovering alcoholic.
- History or current use of recreational drugs or narcotics.
- Determine smoking status of subjects and exclude current smokers.
- Determine reason for placing implants in subject to exclude subjects whose implants were placed for trauma.
Contacts and Locations| United States, New York | |
| State University of New York at Buffalo | |
| Buffalo, New York, United States, 14260-1604 | |
| Israel | |
| The Hebrew University-Hadassah | |
| Jerusalem, Israel | |
| Principal Investigator: | Jonathan Mann, MSc | |
| Principal Investigator: | Joseph J Zambon, DDS |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Willaim DeVizio/VP - Clinical Research, Colgate Palmolive |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00762619 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CRO-2007-IMPLANT-PS |
| Study First Received: | September 26, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | August 24, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | January 4, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Gingival Diseases Periodontal Diseases Mouth Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases Fluorides Triclosan Hexachlorophene Cariostatic Agents Protective Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs |
Pharmacologic Actions Fatty Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Hypolipidemic Agents Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Anti-Infective Agents, Local Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Lipid Regulating Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013