Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin for the Treatment of Voiding Dysfunction in Female
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Study NCT00679315   Information provided by Samsung Medical Center
First Received: May 14, 2008   Last Updated: July 5, 2009   History of Changes

May 14, 2008
July 5, 2009
June 2008
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Actual change in the score of IPSS from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment. [ Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00679315 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • IPSS parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • BFLUTS-SF parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Uroflowmetry & PVR parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Micturition diary parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Quality of life parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Patient Perception of Bladder Condition [ Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) Questions [ Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
IPSS parameters [ Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
 
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin for the Treatment of Voiding Dysfunction in Female
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin for the Treatment of Non-Neurogenic Voiding Dysfunction in Female: An 8 Week Prospective, Randomized Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study (Phase Ⅱ)

The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy of Alfuzosin (10 mg, qd) in reducing the score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment in female patients with voiding dysfunction.

Trial design

Phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of alfuzosin (10mg, qd) from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment in female patients with non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction.

Efficacy Assessment

  1. Primary efficacy endpoint

    Actual change in the score of IPSS from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment.

  2. Secondary efficacy endpoint

    • IPSS parameters
    • Percent change in the score of IPSS from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.
    • Actual and percent changes in the sub-scale of IPSS from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment
    • Storage score: sum of questions 2, 4 and 7
    • Voiding score: sum of questions 1, 3, 5 and 6
    • Scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS-SF)parameters
    • Actual and Percent change in BFLUTS-SF from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.
    • Actual and percent changes in the sub-scale of BFLUTS-SF from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment

      • BFLUTS-FS: sum scores F1-F4
      • BFLUTS-VS: sum scores V1-V3
      • BFLUTS-IS: sum scores I1-I5
      • BFLUTS-sex: sum scores S1 & S2
    • Uroflowmetry & PVR parameters

      • Numeric and percent changes from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.
      • Maximum flow rate (mL/s)
      • Average flow rate (mL/s)
      • Post-void residual urine (mL)
      • Micturition diary parameters
      • Change in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Change in mean number of nighttime micturitions per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Percent change of nighttime micturitions per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Change in mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline (Urgency episodes are defined as those with Bladder Sensation Scale rating of ≥ 3 in the diary).
      • Percent change of urgency episodes per 24 hours at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Change in the mean and sum rating on the Bladder Sensation Scale at weeks 4 and 8 relative to baseline
      • Quality of life (QoL) parameters
      • Change in Bother score of IPSS from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.
      • Change in QOL subscale scores of BFLUTS SF from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks of treatment
      • BFLUTS-QoL: Sum scores QoL1-QoL5
      • Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
      • Change from baseline in PPBC after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment
      • Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue (BSW) Questions
      • Patient Perception of Treatment Benefit at week 8
      • Patient Perception of Treatment Satisfaction at week 8
      • Willingness to continue with treatment at week 8
Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Female Voiding Dysfunction
  • Drug: alfuzosin hydrochloride XL 10mg
  • Drug: Placebo
  • Experimental: alfuzosin hydrochloride XL 10mg
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
280
December 2009
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female aged ≥ 18
  • Have voiding symptoms as chief complaints over 3 months
  • IPSS symptom score ≥ 15
  • A peak flow rate <12 mL/sec with a minimum voided volume of 100 mL and/or a postvoid residual urine volume >150 mL
  • Underwent pressure-flow study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet any of the following criteria are to be excluded from the study:
  • Neurogenic voiding dysfunction
  • Anatomic causes of bladder outlet obstruction
  • Perform physical examination in patients diagnosed as BOO in pressure-flow study by urethral evaluation with 16 Fr urethral sound: if there is resistance to 16Fr sound, it will be diagnosed as anatomical BOO and the patients can not participate in the study.
  • Previous surgical procedures related to incontinence or cystocele
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Intake of medications and drugs affecting bladder function: alpha blocker, anticholinergic
  • Anticholinergic drugs: Tolterodine, Oxybutynin, Propiverin, Trospium, Solifenacin, SSRI including TCA
  • Cholinergic drug: Bethanechol
  • Any other blocker other than alfuzosin
  • patients can be enrolled after wash-out
  • Any positive urine culture had to be successfully treated before the recruitment.
  • Clinically significant ( ≥ Stamey grade II/III) stress incontinence as determined by the investigator and confirmed for female patients by a cough provocation test.
  • Recurrent UTIs defined as having been treated for symptomatic UTIs ≥ 4 times in the last year
  • Diagnosed or suspected interstitial cystitis
  • Patients with marked cystocele or other clinically significant pelvic prolapse.
  • Treatment within the 14 days preceding randomization, or expected to initiate treatment during the study with:
  • Estrogen treatment started more than 2 months prior to inclusion will be allowed
  • Receipt of any electrostimulation or bladder training within the 14 days before randomization, or expected to start such treatment during the study.
  • Hypersensitive to the study drug
  • Orthotopic hypotension or history of orthotopic hypotension
  • Intake of calcium channel blockers
  • Severe hepatic or renal dysfunctions
Female
18 Years and older
No
Contact: Kyu-Sung Lee, Ph.D 82-2-3410-3554 ksleedr@skku.edu
Korea, Republic of
 
NCT00679315
Kyu-Sung Lee/Professor, Samsung Medical Center
2007-07-073
Samsung Medical Center
  • Handok Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
  • The Korean Urological Association
Principal Investigator: Kyu-Sung Lee, Ph.D Samsung Medical Center
Samsung Medical Center
June 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP