Intravenous Heparin as an Adjunct for the Treatment of Anaphylactic Reactions in an Emergency Department
To determine if intravenous unfractionated heparin (with standard therapy) for treatment of anaphylaxis results in faster time to recovery.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Official Title:||Intravenous Heparin as an Adjunct for the Treatment of Anaphylactic/Anaphylactoid Reactions in the Emergency Department|
- Time to improve to a severity score of 1 or complete resolution of signs/symptoms. [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
|Study Start Date:||December 2009|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||December 2010|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Placebo Comparator: 2
Standard treatment (epinephrine, corticosteroids, diphenhydramine, and H2 blockers) plus an equal volume bolus of normal saline after the first doses are administered.
Standard treatment (epinephrine, corticosteroids, diphenhydramine, and H2 blockers) and saline.
Standard therapy plus a one-time bolus of heparin at 80 U/kg (maximum dose of 10,000 Units) given immediately after the first doses of standard treatment.
Drug: Intravenous heparin
Intravenous heparin as an adjunct for the treatment of anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions in the Emergency Department.
To determine if a single bolus of intravenous unfractionated heparin (in conjunction with standard therapy) given to patients with anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions results in a faster time to recovery when compared to standard therapy alone.
Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening entity that requires both immediate recognition and aggressive treatment. Although anaphylaxis is infrequent, comprising only 1% of approximately 1.03 million visits to the ED each year that are related to allergic reactions, it is none the less a generally under-recognized and under-treated disease, that is worthy of study due to the potential for a fatal outcome. Recently, there has been renewed interest in a commonly used and inexpensive drug (heparin) as a novel component of therapy for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions. Heflin eft al. induced anaphylactoid reactions in pigs and compared intravenous unfractionated heparin in one treatment arm to standard therapy (intravenous epinephrine and diphenhydramine) versus placebo. The study revealed that heparin rapidly reversed the shock similar to that of standard emergency treatment. Of course this single study done in pigs will not change practice, but it does warrant further investigation into the role that heparin plays in anaphylaxis in humans.
|United States, Missouri|
|Truman Medical Center ED|
|Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108|
|St. Luke's Hospital ED|
|Kansas City, Missouri, United States|
|Principal Investigator:||Ryan Jacobsen, MD||Truman Medical Center|
|Principal Investigator:||Stefanie Ellison, MD||Truman Medical Center|