Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Phase 3 Multicenter Comparative Study to Confirm Safety and Effectiveness of the F(ab)2 Antivenom Anavip.
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V., November 2009
First Received: March 11, 2008   Last Updated: November 12, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
Collaborators: Instituto de Biotecnologia,UNAM, Cuernavaca Mexico
University of Arizona
Information provided by: Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00636116
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to establish if F(ab)2 antivenom (Anavip) is safe for crotalinae envenomation. Confirm its effectiveness in preventing the occurrence of delayed coagulopathies and compare the safety and efficacy with Fab antivenom (CroFab) in patients with Crotalinae envenomation.


Condition Intervention Phase
Snake Bite
Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2
Biological: Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine
Phase III

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: A Comparison of Anavip® and CroFab® in the Treatment of Patients With Crotalinae Envenomation: A Randomized, Prospective, Blinded, Controlled, Comparative, Multicenter Study

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Incidence rate of patients experiencing coagulopathy during the follow-up phase of the study. Absolute Platelet levels < 150,000/mm3. Absolute Fibrinogen levels < 150 mg/dL. Clinical coagulopathy requiring additional antivenom. [ Time Frame: Study Day 5 (±/- 1 day), Study Day 8 (±/- 1 day) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Comparison between groups of: Percentage of patients who experience venonemia. Absolute platelet level measured Lowest absolute platelet level measured Absolute fibrinogen level Lowest absolute fibrinogen level [ Time Frame: Study Day 5 (+/- 1 day) and Study Day 8 (+/- 1 day) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Estimated Enrollment: 93
Study Start Date: May 2008
Estimated Study Completion Date: March 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: November 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Group 1: Experimental
Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy
Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2
Anavip with Anavip Maintenance Therapy
Group 2: Experimental
Anavip with Placebo Maintenance Therapy
Biological: Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2
Anavip with Placebo Maintenance Therapy
Group 3: Active Comparator
CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy
Biological: Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab, ovine
CroFab with CroFab Maintenance Therapy

Detailed Description:

Fewer than 200,000 crotaline envenomations occur annually in the US.Crotaline venoms contain a broad variety of toxins, venom variability and injection quantity among individual snakes and across species result in broadly variable patient presentations. Clinical consequences of crotaline envenomation include local and systemic effects, both of which may progress for hours to days.The best studied systemic consequence is coagulopathy, which may in its complexity mimic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Platelet and clotting disorders respond rapidly to administration of polyvalent antivenom.

Crotaline viper envenomation in the United States is treated with one of two licensed products: Wyeth Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent (Polyvalent), or CroFab® (antivenin Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab, ovine). In recent years, both of these products have been in critically short supply. Use of Wyeth Polyvalent has been associated with a greater than 75% incidence of adverse reactions, including acute type 1 and delayed type 2 immune reactions.These phenomena are an inherent risk in the use of whole immunoglobulin. CroFab´s low molecular weight creates a pharmacokinetic mismatch with crotaline venom which leds to a recurrent venom effects.

Anavip is pharmacologically and pharmacokinetically different.Because of the elimination of the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin molecule, Anavip is expected to produce far fewer adverse reactions than seen with whole immunoglobulin antivenoms and unlike Fab molecules, F(ab)2 molecules exceed the size threshold for renal clearance and thus are expected to remain in circulation for a significantly longer time and substantially reduce the incidence of recurrent coagulopathy.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   2 Years to 80 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women 2 to 80 years of age
  • Presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
  • Informed consent document read and signed by patient (or parent/legal guardian)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
  • Current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
  • Positive urine or blood pregnancy test at screening
  • Breast-feeding
  • Allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
  • Underlying medical conditions that significantly alter platelet count or fibrinogen; thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia
  • Use of any medication expected to affect platelet count, coagulation factors or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin
  • No clinical indications of snake bite requiring antivenom for treatment
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00636116

Contacts
Contact: Walter García, MD (5255)54883700 ext 3785 wgarcia@silanes.com.mx
Contact: Charles Perry (615)4147270 cperry@raretx.com

Locations
United States, Arizona
Tucson Site 1 Recruiting
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85741
Phoenix Site 1 Recruiting
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
Tucson Site 2 Recruiting
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
Tuscson Site 3 Recruiting
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85713
Phoenix Site 2 Recruiting
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85008
United States, California
San Diego Site 1 Recruiting
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
California Site Recruiting
Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
San Diego Site 2 Recruiting
San Diego, California, United States, 92123
United States, Florida
Florida Site Recruiting
Jacksonsville, Florida, United States, 32209
United States, Louisiana
Lousiana Site Recruiting
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
United States, Missouri
Kansas City Site Completed
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
United States, New Mexico
Albuquerque Site Recruiting
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
United States, North Carolina
Greenville Site Active, not recruiting
Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
United States, Texas
Temple Site Recruiting
Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
El Paso Site Recruiting
El Paso, Texas, United States, 79905
San Antonio Site Not yet recruiting
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
Sponsors and Collaborators
Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.
Instituto de Biotecnologia,UNAM, Cuernavaca Mexico
University of Arizona
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Alejandro Alagon Cano, PhD Instituto de Biotecnología UNAM
Study Director: Walter García Ubbelohde, MD Instituto Bioclon
Principal Investigator: Leslie Boyer, MD Viper Institute, UoA
  More Information

Additional Information:
No publications provided

Responsible Party: Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V. ( Walter García Ubbelohde, Clinical Research Manager )
Study ID Numbers: YA-07/02
Study First Received: March 11, 2008
Last Updated: November 12, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00636116     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration

Keywords provided by Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.:
snake bite
antivenin treatment

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Poisoning
Disorders of Environmental Origin
Bites and Stings
Snake Bites

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 08, 2010