Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/Day Versus Asacol 2.4 g/Day (ASCEND I)
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00577473   Information provided by Procter and Gamble
First Received: December 19, 2007   Last Updated: February 11, 2008   History of Changes

December 19, 2007
February 11, 2008
February 2001
February 2003   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
the proportion of patients in each treatment group who improved from baseline at Week 6 [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00577473 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
patient improvement at Week 3, sigmoidoscopic and clinical improvement (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA, and PFA), and quality of life (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire) at Weeks 3 and 6. [ Time Frame: 3 and 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
 
Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/Day Versus Asacol 2.4 g/Day (ASCEND I)
A Double-Blind, Randomized, 6 Week, Parallel-Group Design Clinical Trial in Patients With Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/Day Versus Asacol 2.4 g/Day

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Asacol 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) versus Asacol 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4.8 g/day using 800 mg Asacol tablets as compared to 2.4g/day using 400 mg Asacol tablets in newly- and previously-diagnosed patients who are experiencing a flare-up of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis.

Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Ulcerative Colitis
Drug: mesalamine
  • Active Comparator: mesalamine 2.4 g/day (400 mg tablet) for 6 weeks
  • Experimental: mesalamine 4.8 g/day (800 mg tablet) for 6 weeks
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
308
February 2003
February 2003   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to salicylates or aminosalicylates;
  • a history of extensive small bowel resectio
Both
18 Years to 65 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00577473
Piotr Krzeski, MD, Procter and Gamble
2000083
Procter and Gamble
 
Study Director: Jeffery Kralstein, MD Procter and Gamble
Procter and Gamble
February 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP