Percutaneous Autologous Bone-marrow Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fracture (IMOCA)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The treatment of open tibial shaft fracture is often complicated by delayed union or non-union. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of autologous concentrated bone-marrow to accelerate healing of open tibial shaft fractures and to reduce the need for secondary intervention.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 186 patients with an open tibial will be randomized to receive either the standard of care (fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management), or the standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow. Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post-fracture.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Tibial Fractures Fractures, Open |
Procedure: Osteosynthesis |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Injection of Concentrated Autologous Bone-marrow (IMOCA) and Bone Union of Open Tibial Shaft Fracture: Randomized Study to Assess Efficiency of IMOCA in Addition to Standard of Care. |
- Proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve month post fracture. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Relation between the number of the progenitor available injected with concentrated bone marrow aspirated and the rate of bone union. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Comparison of the rate of complications between the 2 groups. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Economic impact study. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 85 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2007 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control in arm fields
Standard treatment Intervention no'Osteosynthesis'
|
Procedure: Osteosynthesis
Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'
|
|
Experimental: IMOCA
Intervention 'Osteosynthesis' Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting - surgical technique (ref: Hernigou Ph et al J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2006; 88 (sup 1 part 2): 322-327
|
Procedure: Osteosynthesis
Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'
|
Detailed Description:
This study will be conducted at 13 University Hospitals in France. The protocol has been approved by the institutional review board. After written informed consent, patients will be randomized, in the days after the fracture in 2 groups of 93 patients : 1) the control group (standard of care only: fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management) and 2) the study group (standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow). Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound and by center. For the wound, strata A comprise Gustilo-Anderson types I, II and III-A and strata B, type III-B.
For the study group, the injection is scheduled at 1 month ± 5 days after the fracture. The techniques have been described by Hernigou (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(sup 1 part 2): 322-327). There are 3 steps: marrow aspiration (300 - 500 g) from iliac crest under general anesthesia, centrifugation in cell therapy unit to obtain a concentrated buffy coat of about 50 ml containing progenitor cells and other mononuclear cells, percutaneous injection in the fracture site of 20-30 ml of the buffy coat under fluoroscopy control.
Apart from the injection, the standard of care is the same for the 2 groups. Patients will be followed for 12 months, with assessments at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
All analysis will be based on the intent to treat the population. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post fracture. An independent panel of surgeons will evaluate all secondary procedure with the potential of promoting fracture-healing.
An independent evaluation of fracture union will be conducted by a radiology panel blinded to treatment allocation and all other patient data.
An outcome will be considered to be successful when the fracture heal, according to the investigator, without secondary intervention and is radiographically united during patient follow-up.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 17 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 17 years or more
- Open tibial shaft fracture with Gustilo-Anderson type I, II, III A or B
- Written informed consent
- Affiliated to French Social Security
Exclusion Criteria:
- Circumferential bone loss
- Vascular or nerve injury
- Injury, other than tibial fracture, interfering with weight bearing
- Infection (skin, soft-tissue or bone)
- Disease or treatment interfering with bone union: head injury with coma, pathologic fracture
- Medical history on iliac wing contraindicating bone-marrow aspiration
- Corticoid or immunosuppressive therapy more than one week
- Pregnancy at the day of inclusion in study
- History of positive serology for HIV1+2, HBs, HCV
- Adult in the care of a guardian
- Impossibility to meet at the appointments for the follow-up
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| UH Angers | |
| Angers, France, 49933 | |
| UH Besançon Jean Minjoz | |
| Besancon, France, 25030 | |
| UH Brest Cavale Blanche | |
| Brest, France, 29200 | |
| UH Clermont Ferrand Gabriel Montpied | |
| Clermont Ferrand, France, 63 000 | |
| UH Grenoble South Hospital | |
| Grenoble, France, 38434 | |
| UH Grenoble Michallon Hospital | |
| Grenoble, France, 38043 | |
| UH Nancy Central Hospital | |
| Nancy, France, 54000 | |
| UH Nantes Hôtel Dieu | |
| Nantes, France, 44 | |
| UH Pitié Salpétrière AH HP | |
| Paris, France, 75013 | |
| UH Tours CHRU Trousseau | |
| Tours, France, 37 044 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Philippe Rosset, Pr | Service d'orthopédie II - CHRU de Tours |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | University Hospital, Tours |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00512434 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PHRN/06/PR/IMOCA, ID RCB 2007 - A00032 - 51 |
| Study First Received: | August 6, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | March 27, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) |
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Tours:
|
tibial shaft fracture open |
bone-marrow graft injection mesenchymal stem cell |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Fractures, Bone Fractures, Open Tibial Fractures Wounds and Injuries Leg Injuries |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013