Patient-Centered Heart Failure Trial (PCDM)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Department of Veterans Affairs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00461513
First received: April 17, 2007
Last updated: April 14, 2014
Last verified: April 2014
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a patient-centered disease management intervention for VA patients with heart failure.


Condition Intervention
Heart Failure, Congestive
Behavioral: Patient-Centered Disease Management Model
Behavioral: Collaborative Care

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Patient-Centered Disease Management for Heart Failure Trial

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Change in Chronic Heart Failure health status between baseline and 12 months. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Hospitalization and mortality, depressive symptoms, patients' self-efficacy in management of CHF, adherence to prescribed medications, patient satisfaction, proportion of patients with guideline-concordant care, cost-effectiveness of the intervention. [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 392
Study Start Date: May 2009
Study Completion Date: June 2012
Primary Completion Date: June 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Groups/Cohorts Assigned Interventions
Group 1
The PCDM intervention will include evaluation of CHF care by the collaborative care team, with diagnostic and therapeutic treatment recommendations based on current ACC/AHA national clinical practice guidelines, daily telemonitoring and patient self-care support utilizing the VA telemonitoring system, and screening and treatment for comorbid depression. The Collaborative Care (CC) team at each site will consist of a primary care provider, cardiologist, and psychiatrist, who are local opinion leaders, as well as a nurse site coordinator and pharmacist. For a given intervention patient, there will be an initial assessment of care by the CC team following the enrollment visit. Each intervention patient will be re-reviewed by the CC team a minimum of 2 additional times (at 6-weeks and 6 months). In addition, patients will have daily telemonitoring, and their care will be reviewed by the CC team if the telemonitoring data suggests clinical deterioration.
Behavioral: Patient-Centered Disease Management Model
Disease management has emerged as a promising strategy to improve the outcomes of patients with CHF. Disease management in this study will use a multidisciplinary collaborative care, t leveraging health information technology, and focusing on patient self-care.
Behavioral: Collaborative Care
Collaborative care is the use of multidisciplinary teams to deliver evidence-based treatment to a defined population of patients with chronic illness.
Group 2
Patients randomized to the usual care arm will continue to receive care at the discretion of their regular VA providers (for a given patient, this could include cardiology specialty care in addition to PCP care, participation in site-specific CHF programs such as CHF patient education classes, etc.), in direct continuity with the care they were receiving prior to enrollment. Patients in the usual care group will also be given information sheets that outline self-care for CHF, and will be provided with a scale, if needed, at the enrollment visit. Patients in the usual care group will have the same amount of interaction with the study team as the intervention patients (i.e. complete questionnaires at the same frequency; have the same study visits). PCPs of usual care patients will be notified of the results of all screening studies (patient survey results, lab tests) as we have done in previous studies.

Detailed Description:

Background/Rationale: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the VA. Disease management is a promising strategy to improve care and outcomes, but evidence supporting CHF disease management is inconsistent and open questions remain. Prior studies have not evaluated a multi-modal intervention combining multidisciplinary collaborative care, telemonitoring, promotion of patient self-care, and an explicit intervention for comorbid depression, which is a barrier to optimal CHF care and outcomes. Moreover, the effectiveness of CHF disease management has not been evaluated in the VA.

Objective(s): We propose to evaluate a Patient-Centered Disease Management (PCDM) intervention that includes case finding, collaborative care management for both CHF and comorbid depression, and home telemonitoring. The primary aim will be to ascertain whether the PCDM intervention results in better patient health status (i.e. symptom burden, functional status, and quality of life) than usual care. Secondary aims will include assessment of whether the intervention will reduce hospitalizations or mortality, result in more guideline-concordant care, and reduce depression while increasing patient medication adherence, self-efficacy and satisfaction with treatment.

Methods: We propose a 3-year, multi-site randomized study. VA patients with CHF from 4 VA Medical Centers (Denver, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Seattle) and their affiliated clinics who have diminished CHF-specific health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores<50) will be eligible. We will randomize enrolled patients to a 12-month PCDM intervention versus usual care (target 300 patients in each arm). The PCDM intervention will include collaborative care management for CHF and comorbid depression and daily telemonitoring. Patient self-care will be promoted through the telemonitoring intervention and the depression intervention. The primary analysis will be a comparison of change in health status (KCCQ scores) between enrollment and 12 months for the intervention versus usual care groups. Secondary analyses will include comparison of rates of hospitalization and death, depressive symptoms, the proportion of patients with guideline concordant CHF care, medication adherence, 6-minute walk test, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. In addition, cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. All analyses will be intention to treat.

Impact: If successful, the proposed intervention will improve the quality of care and outcomes of veterans with CHF and be cost effective. The intervention has the potential to serve as model for other disease management interventions in the VA, and is designed as an 'effectiveness' trial to enhance implementation. This study will be a joint effort of the CHF and IHD QUERI groups, Patient Care Services, and Office of Care Coordination. The study directly addresses several aims of the recently published 'QUERI: A New Direction' position statement, including: a) partnership between QUERI groups; b) explicit collaborative ties between QUERI and 'operational' components of the VA (i.e. Patient Care Services and Office of Care Coordination); c) focus beyond a single disease entity (i.e. CHF and depression); and d) clinical studies of interventions that might be candidates for national VA implementation. Moreover, this study specifically engages patients in their care and emphasizes quality of life outcomes, both of central import to the VA health care mission.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population

VA Patients in Denver, Palo Alto, Richmond and Seattle who have a diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure and have low health status.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure;
  • low health status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive/psychiatric impairment (inability to complete questionnaires);
  • nursing home resident;
  • irreversible non-cardiac medical condition likely to affect 6-month survival or ability to execute study protocol;
  • prior heart transplantation.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00461513

Locations
United States, California
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1207
United States, Colorado
Denver VA Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80220-0166
United States, Virginia
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
United States, Washington
Seattle
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Principal Investigator: John Spalding Rumsfeld, MD PhD Department of Veterans Affairs
  More Information

Publications:
Responsible Party: Department of Veterans Affairs
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00461513     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: IIR 06-068
Study First Received: April 17, 2007
Last Updated: April 14, 2014
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:
Heart Failure, Congestive
Disease Management
Health Status
Quality of Life
Telemedicine
Depression

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Heart Failure
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on September 18, 2014