Use of Spinal Sealant System During Spinal Surgery
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborator:
Confluent Surgical
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00458354
First received: March 29, 2007
Last updated: October 10, 2011
Last verified: October 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Spinal Sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods (control) to obtain watertight dural closure intraoperatively in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Spinal Sealant as an adjunct to sutured dural repair compared with standard of care methods (control) to obtain watertight dural closure in patients undergoing spinal surgery up to 90 days post-procedure.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Spine Surgery Excessive Repair Spinal Cord Injuries Complication of Surgical Procedure |
Device: Spinal Sealant Procedure: Standard Methods of Closing of the Dura |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Spinal Sealant System as an Adjunct to Sutured Dural Repair With Standard of Care Methods During Spinal Surgery |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Percent (%) success obtaining watertight closure following assigned treatment (Spinal Sealant or control) [ Time Frame: Determination in course of surgery with up to 90 day post operative follow-up. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage (%) success in obtaining a watertight closure following assigned treatment (Spinal Sealant or control) defined as either Success (A watertight closure of the dural repair intra-operatively after assigned treatment, confirmed by Valsalva maneuver at 20-25 cm H2O for 10-15 seconds); or Failure (A non-watertight closure of the dural repair intra-operatively after assigned treatment, confirmed by Valsalva maneuver at 20-25 cm H2O for 10-15 seconds). This will be determined intraoperatively.
| Enrollment: | 3 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Spinal Sealant
Dural repair with the Spinal Sealant System.
|
Device: Spinal Sealant
Spinal Sealant System which will be sprayed over the stitches to close the opening in the dura.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard Methods
Dural repair with standard methods such as the closing of the dura with stitches.
|
Procedure: Standard Methods of Closing of the Dura
Standard methods such as the closing of the dura with stitches.
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is between 18 and 75 years of age.
- Patient is scheduled for a spinal procedure that entails a dural incision.
- Patient requires a procedure involving surgical wound classification Class I/Clean (per CDC criteria).
- Patient, or authorized representative, has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
- Intraoperative Criteria: Presence of non-watertight closure, either spontaneously or upon Valsalva maneuver to 20-25 cm H20 for 5-10 seconds.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient has active spinal and/or systemic infection.
- Patient will require additional spine surgery within the study time period.
- Patient has had a previous spinal surgery involving dural exposure and/or entry at the same level(s) as the study procedure.
- Patient has pre-existing external lumbar CSF drain or internal CSF shunt.
- Patient is participating in a clinical trial of another investigational device or drug.
- Patient with creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL.
- Patient with total bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dL.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females or females who wish to become pregnant during the length of study participation.
- Patient has been treated with chronic steroid therapy unless discontinued more than 6 weeks prior to surgery (standard perioperative steroids are permitted). For purposes of this protocol, chronic steroid therapy is defined as greater than 4 weeks.
- Patient has documented history of significant coagulopathy with a PTT > 35 sec, PT/ INR >1.2, receiving aspirin, or NSAIDS at the time of surgery. Note: Patients who are receiving cardiovascular prophylaxis are not excluded.
- Patient is receiving warfarin or heparin at the time of surgery (including analogs).
- Patient has a diagnosed and documented compromised immune system and/or autoimmune disease.
- Patient has had chemotherapy treatment within 6 months prior to, or planned during the study (until completion of last follow-up evaluation).
- Patient has had prior radiation treatment to the surgical site or has planned radiation therapy within 30 days post procedure.
- Patient has a known malignancy or another condition with prognosis shorter than 6 months.
- Patients has a documented history of uncontrolled diabetes.
- The investigator determines that the patient should not be included in the study for reason(s) not already specified.
- Intraoperative Criteria: Patient requires use of a synthetic or non-autologous duraplasty material.
- Intraoperative Criteria: Patient has a gap of greater than 2mm remaining after primary dural closure.
- Patient has undergone laminoplasty decompression.
- Patient has undergone a Chiari Malformation procedure that does not entail a dural incision at or below the C1 level.
- Investigator determines that participation in the study may jeopardize the safety or welfare of the patient.
- Patient has undergone a syringomyelia procedure where the shunt is not placed in the subarachnoid position.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00458354
Locations
| United States, Texas | |
| UT MD Anderson Cancer Center | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Confluent Surgical
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Ian E. McCutcheon, MD | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00458354 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2005-0641 |
| Study First Received: | March 29, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | October 10, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center:
|
Spinal Sealant Spinal Sealant System Dural Repair Spinal Surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Spinal Cord Injuries Keloid Spinal Cord Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Trauma, Nervous System |
Wounds and Injuries Collagen Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases Cicatrix Fibrosis Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013