Use of Intrapartum Biophysical Profile When Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring is Non-reassuring in Labor
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
In this research project the investigators want to figure out whether ultrasound (a non-invasive method) can be used to assess how the fetus is doing during labor.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Fetal Distress |
Procedure: biophysical profile |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Use of Intrapartum Biophysical Profile When Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring is Non-reassuring in Labor |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2005 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2008 |
When you are in labor, the heart beat of your fetus is monitored continuously. The normal pattern is reactive and suggests that the fetus is doing well. When the pattern is different from reactive, it is difficult to say if the fetus is doing well or not. Previous investigators have shown that even with the most worrisome fetal heart rate pattern, only 2/1000 cases would require immediate delivery. Currently, we use invasive procedures like taking a drop of blood from fetal head to further assess how the fetus is doing or just proceed with the fastest way of delivery (which could increase the risk associated with surgery). In this research project we want to figure out whether ultrasound (a non-invasive method) can be used to assess how the fetus is doing during labor.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 14 Years to 45 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spontaneous or induced labor
- Gestational ages between 35 - 42 weeks
- Singleton pregnancy
- Intrapartum non-reassuring or uninterpretable FHR tracing defined as any tracing that the Labor and Delivery obstetrician is uncomfortable about or feels does not absolutely provide fetal reassurance. Inclusive FHR patterns will be repetitive late decelerations, recurrent moderate to severe variable decelerations, reduced long or short-term variability, prolonged bradycardia (<120/min) that resolves, persistent fetal tachycardia (>160/min for >60 min,) or any other FHR patterns necessitating further fetal well being evaluation (like scalp pH or scalp stimulation).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple gestation
- Gestational age < 35 weeks
- Patient denial to undergo ultrasound examination during labor
- Abnormal FHR tracing requiring stat delivery
Contacts and Locations| United States, New Jersey | |
| Cooper UniversityHospital | |
| Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Meena Khandelwal, MD | Cooper University Hospital |
More Information
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00454012 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 05046 |
| Study First Received: | March 27, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | November 7, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by The Cooper Health System:
|
non reassuring fetal heart rate tracing biophysical profile assessing fetal wellbeing |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Fetal Distress Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013