Anticoagulation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Cancer Patients With a Venous Thromboembolism
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The development of clots is a potentially deadly complication in many cancer patients. The current optimal treatment is unknown. Evidence supporting the effectiveness of the use of Inferior Vena Caval Filters is lacking. This study will compare the two standard of care treatment options: anticoagulation with or without a inferior vena cava filter. The anticoagulation medication chosen will be Arixtra and it will be given once a day as an injection. Patients will be called at various intervals to monitor their signs and symptoms of new thromboembolisms.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Cancer Thromboembolism |
Drug: Arixtra Device: Inferior Vena Cava Filter (with or without) Drug: Arixtra alone Device: Arixtra + filter |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Control Trial of Anticoagulation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Cancer Patients With A Venous Thromboembolism |
- Death due to any cause, event free survival. [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Occurrence of pulmonary embolism, [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- major bleeding, thrombophlebitis, [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- cellulitis secondary to IV filter, [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- thrombosis of the IVC filter and quality of life. [ Time Frame: One year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 64 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1- Arixtra Alone
Arixtra Alone
|
Drug: Arixtra
Arixtra
Other Name: Arixtra alone as subq injection - dose dependent upon age and size of pt.
Drug: Arixtra alone
Arixtra subq injection 5mg dose (dose also dependent upon size and age of pt)
Other Name: Arixtra
|
|
Active Comparator: 2 Arixtra+ filter
Arixtra + filter
|
Device: Inferior Vena Cava Filter (with or without)
IVC filter - filter of choice by radiologist
Other Name: IVC filter
Device: Arixtra + filter
Atrixa as daily injections similar to arm I and placement of IVC filter.
Other Name: IVC filter and Arixtra
Device: Arixtra + filter
Arixtra subq injection + IVC filter
Other Name: Arixtra as subq injection dose dependent upon age and size of pt. Plus placement of IVC filter
|
Detailed Description:
The development of clots is a potentially deadly complication in many cancer patients. The current optimal treatment is unknown. Evidence supporting the effectiveness of the use of Inferior Vena Caval Filters is lacking. This study will compare the two standard of care treatment options: anticoagulation with or without an inferior vena cava filter. The anticoagulation medication chosen will be Arixtra and it will be given once a day as an injection. Patients will be called at various intervals to monitor their signs and symptoms of new thromboembolisms. Patients will be equally randomized to receive either Arixtra with or without placement of an IVC filter. Fifty three patients are expected to be enrolled in each arm. Patients will be monitored for 90 days after study enrollment. Monitoring will include telephone calls and physician visits and repeat radiologists if the patient is symptomatic of a DVT. This will also include completion of a quality of life questionnaire.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cancer patient, over 18 years of age, acute radiographically confirmed denovo DVT or PE.
Contacts and Locations| United States, New York | |
| North Shore University Hospital | |
| Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Myra Barginear, MD | North Shore University Hospital Monter Cancer Center |
| Principal Investigator: | Daniel R. Budman, MD | North Shore University Hospital Monter Cancer Center |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00423683 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IRB # 06-034 |
| Study First Received: | January 17, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | June 29, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System:
|
Cancer thromboembolism |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Thromboembolism Venous Thromboembolism Venous Thrombosis Embolism and Thrombosis Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Thrombosis Fondaparinux PENTA |
Anticoagulants Hematologic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Fibrinolytic Agents Fibrin Modulating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Cardiovascular Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013