Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder
This study has been terminated.
(36 months of longterm follow up have been completed without substantial change to the profile. No further studies are currently planned.)
Sponsor:
Tengion
Information provided by:
Tengion
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00419120
First received: January 4, 2007
Last updated: August 9, 2011
Last verified: August 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Subjects with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida (myelodysplasia) that is refractory to medical treatment and require augmentation cystoplasty will be enrolled. The hypothesis is that augmentation cystoplasty using an autologous neo-bladder construct will significantly increase bladder compliance.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Neurogenic Bladder |
Other: Autologous neo bladder construct |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | An Open-Label Multicenter Study of Augmentation Cystoplasty Using an Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct in Subjects With Spina Bifida |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
spina bifida
MedlinePlus related topics:
Spina Bifida
Drug Information available for:
Phenylephrine
Phenylephrine hydrochloride
Oxymetazoline
Oxymetazoline hydrochloride
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Tengion:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Number of Responders as Assessed by Compliance [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Efficacy of the autologous neo-bladder construct as assessed by a responder analysis (comparing each patient's baseline with 12 month data). Improvement in compliance (i.e. improved bladder pressure/volume relationship) was measured by urodynamics at predetermined bladder pressure points. This was coupled with an assessment of clinical benefit and used to determine responders versus non-responders
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Overall Safety Profile - Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event [ Time Frame: periodically within first 12 months as well as during long term follow up out to 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]clinical evaluation of adverse events, laboratory parameters and urinary imaging to assess any safety issues emerging from this technology and to allow a comparison of a safety profile with standard of care enterocystoplasty. Please refer to the Adverse Event section for detailed information.
| Enrollment: | 10 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | October 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Receipt of autologous neo-bladder construct
|
Other: Autologous neo bladder construct
augmentation cystoplasty with autologous neo-bladder construct
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 3 Years to 21 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- subjects with neurogenic bladders secondary to myleodysplasia
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior augment procedures
- recent urologic surgery
- requires concomitant urologic intervention
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Sunita Sheth, MD, Tengion, Inc |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00419120 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TNG-CL003 |
| Study First Received: | January 4, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | December 8, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | August 9, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases |
Urinary Bladder Diseases Urologic Diseases Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013