A Randomized Trial of Surgical Treatments for Vulvar and Vaginal Dysplasia
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Information provided by:
University Hospitals of Cleveland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00394758
First received: October 30, 2006
Last updated: NA
Last verified: October 2006
History: No changes posted
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
- To compare the recurrence rate between the use of laser vaporization and ultrasonic surgical aspiration in the treatment of vulvar and vaginal dysplasias
- To compare healing related complications, post-operative pain, and scarring between the two procedures.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Vulvar Dysplasia Vaginal Dysplasia |
Procedure: CO2 laser surgery Procedure: ultrasonic surgical aspiration |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of Surgical Procedures in Vulvar and Vaginal Dysplasias |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University Hospitals of Cleveland:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- recurrence rate
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- pain
- side effects
- complications
| Estimated Enrollment: | 150 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2000 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2005 |
First line of treatment for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is not well defined. Laser vaporization and ultrasonic surgical aspiration are both accepted surgical modalities used in the treatment of vulvar and vaginal dysplasias, however no prospective study has been done to compare the two procedures. The specific aims of this research study include:
- To compare the recurrence rate between the use of laser vaporization and ultrasonic surgical aspiration in the treatment of vulvar and vaginal dysplasias in a prospective, multi-institutional, randomized clinical trial.
- To compare healing related complications, post-operative pain, and scarring between the two procedures.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who present with vulvar or vaginal dysplasias or condylomas that require surgical intervention will be informed of the study by the treating physician
- Pre-operative biopsies to confirm presence of dysplasia / condyloma. Patients with dysplasias of grade 3 / CIS will be included at the discretion of the treating surgeon and will have had invasion confidently excluded by clinical exam and biopsy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients under the age of eighteen or who are pregnant will be excluded
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00394758
Locations
| United States, Ohio | |
| University Hospitals of Cleveland | |
| Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Vivian von Gruenigen, MD | University Hospitals of Cleveland |
More Information
No publications provided by University Hospitals of Cleveland
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00394758 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CASE 4804 |
| Study First Received: | October 30, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | October 30, 2006 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by University Hospitals of Cleveland:
|
ultrasonic surgical aspiration CO2 laser surgery vulvar dysplasia vaginal dysplasia recurrence |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hyperplasia Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013