Oral HYCAMTIN Plus Whole Brain Radiation Therapy In Treatment Of Brain Metastases Resulting From Non-Small Lung Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00390806
First received: October 19, 2006
Last updated: December 5, 2013
Last verified: December 2013
  Purpose

The current prognosis for patients with metastatic brain cancer from NSCLC is very poor. The current standard treatment for this disease is radiation therapy to the brain. The goal of the current study is to test whether the combination of orally administered HYCAMTIN capsules and whole brain radiation therapy will prolong the survival time of patients with this potentially serious condition.


Condition Intervention Phase
Lung Cancer, Non-Small Cell
Drug: HYCAMTIN, oral capsules
Radiation: Radiation
Phase 3

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Randomized, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Oral Topotecan Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT) Compared With WBRT Alone in Patients With Brain Metastases From Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by GlaxoSmithKline:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Overall Survival [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the date of death due to any cause (up to 195 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until the date of death due to any cause. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Six-month Survival [ Time Frame: Month 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Six-month survival is defined as the percentage of participants alive at 6 months following randomization. The date of last contact was used for those participants who had not died or were lost to follow-up. These participants were classified as having been censored.

  • Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or a Partial Response (PR) (Central Nervous System [CNS]-Radiologic) [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The number of participants achieving either a CR or PR, per World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria, in the CNS was assessed. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses.

  • Time to Response (TTR) (CNS-radiologic) [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    TTR is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented evidence of CR or PR in the CNS. CR is defined as the complete disappearance of all known measurable (Must be accurately measured in >=1 dimension) and nonmeasurable disease, without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of recurrence for at least 4 weeks. CR may have been defined in participants with measurable and/or non-measurable disease at Screening. PR is defined as at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest length and perpendicular width of all measurable disease with no clear increase in nonmeasurable disease in participants without measurable disease. In both cases, there must have been no appearance of new disease, and no clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of disease progression for at least 4 weeks. Assessment of response was performed by the investigator and was based on unconfirmed responses.

  • Time to Progression (TTP) (CNS-radiologic) [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in the CNS. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.

  • Time to Progression (TTP) (All Sites of Disease-radiologic) [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    TTP is defined as the time from Randomization until the first documented sign of disease progression in all sites of disease. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. TTP was analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before a TTP event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.

  • Number of Participants Who Ranked Each Individual Indicated Neurological Sign and Symptom as None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe at Months 1 and 3 [ Time Frame: Months 1 and 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Neurological signs and symptoms data were derived from a participant-reported diary. The participants were asked to assess the following signs and symptoms on a scale of none, mild, moderate, or severe at Months 1 and 3: headache, problems with balance/coordination (PB/C), leg weakness, arm weakness, loss of feeling/numbness (LofF/N), speech difficulty (SD), confusion, loss of memory (LofM), drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, visual problems (VP), seizures, leg/ankle swelling (L/AS), heart burn, difficulty sleeping (DS), tiredness, and appetite/weight gain (A/WG).

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Level of Consciousness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants for the neurological sign and symptom of level of consciousness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; somnolence or sedation not interfering with function (not intefering); somnolence or sedation interfering with function, but not activities of daily living (ADLs) (interfering); obtundation or stupor, difficult to arouse, inteferring with ADLs (obtundation or stupor); coma.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Headache at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], version 3.0) assessed participants for headache and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, Grade (G) 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Dizziness/Lightheadedness at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for dizziness/lightheadedness and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Vertigo at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for vertigo and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Nausea/Vomiting at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for nausea/vomiting and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Visual Problem at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for visual problem and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Seizure at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for seizure and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment for the Neurological Sign and Symptom of Other Neurological Symptoms at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator (per CTCAE, version 3.0) assessed participants for other neurological symptoms and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent, G 1, G 2, G 3, G 4, and G 5. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays G 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: G 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; G 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL; G 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self care ADL; G 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; G 5: death related to AE.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Cranial Nerves II-XII at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of cranial nerves II-XII and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; present, not interfering with ADLs; present, interfering with ADLs; life threatening, disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Language (Dysphasia or Aphasia) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of language (dysphasia or aphasia) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: absent; awareness of receptive or expressive aphasia, not impairing ability to communicate (not impaired); receptive or expressive dysphasia, impairing ability to communicate (impaired); inability to communicate (unable).

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Upper Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left upper extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Right Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (right lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Strength (Left Lower Extremity) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of strength (left lower extremity) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic with weakness on physical examination; Grade 2, symptomatic and interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, symptomatic and interfering with ADLs; Grade 4: bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Sensation at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of sensation and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; loss of deep tendon reflexes or paresthesia, but not interfering with function (not interfering with function); objective sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs (interfering with function); sensory loss or paresthesia interfering with ADLs (intefering with ADLs); permanent sensory loss that interferes with function (permanent sensory loss).

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Right Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (right upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Left Upper Extremity: Finger to Nose Testing) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (left upper extremity: finger to nose testing) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Gait) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (gait) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Investigator Assessment of Ataxia (Balance) at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The investigator assessed participants' status of ataxia (balance) and assigned each participant to one of the following categories: normal; Grade 1, asymptomatic but abnormal on physical examination, and not interfering with function; Grade 2, mild symptoms interfering with function, but not interfering with ADLs; Grade 3, moderate symptoms interfering with ADLs; Grade 4, bedridden or disabling.

  • Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE; Both Serious and Non-serious) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) [ Time Frame: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. For a list of all SAEs and AEs, see the SAE/AE module of this results summary.

  • Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in the Indicated Chemistry Parameters With Respect to the Normal Range [ Time Frame: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    The worst-case change from Baseline in chemistry parameters was measured as decrease to low (DTL), change to normal or no change (CTN/NC), or increase to high (ITH). The worst-case change value could have been measured at any point during the on-therapy period. Participants are counted twice if the participant "Decreased to Low" and "Increased to High" during the on-therapy period.

  • Lesion Assessment and Measurement [ Time Frame: From the time of Randomization until the time of CR or PR (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Lesions were assessed per WHO criteria. For lesion assessment data, see the outcome measure entitled "Number of participants with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) (central nervous system [CNS]-radiologic)."

  • Brain Symptoms [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Brain symptoms were assessed as the number of participants with neurological signs and symptoms. For brain symptom data, see the outcome measures entitled "Number of participants with the indicated investigator assessment for the neurological sign and symptom of X at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3."

  • Number of Participants Who Died or Progressed [ Time Frame: From Randomization until the last clinic visit associated with the study, up until 35 days after the start of the last course of treatment (up to 75 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Disease-related events were measured as the number of participants who died or progressed. Progressive disease (PD) is defined as an increase >=25% in any measurable lesion or, in participants with non-measurable disease only, an estimation of an increase >=25%. In both cases, determination of progression included the appearance of any new lesions, or signification worsening of conditions presumed to be related to malignancy. Participants with clinical or laboratory evidence of possible disease progression were to be evaluated radiologically. Data were analyzed with censoring for extended loss to follow-up to account for two or more missed assessments before an event. The date of the last adequate CNS assessment before extended loss to follow-up was used for censored participants.


Enrollment: 472
Study Start Date: December 2006
Study Completion Date: September 2013
Primary Completion Date: July 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: topotecan plus radiation
topotecan 1.1 mg/m2 followed by whole brain radiation 3 Gy/day for 10 days, followed by optional continuation therapy with topotecan 2.3 mg/m2 for 5 days Q21 days as monotherapy.
Drug: HYCAMTIN, oral capsules
topotecan oral capsules 1.1 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • HYCAMTIN
  • oral capsules
Radiation: Radiation
Whole brain radiation
Active Comparator: Whole brain radiation
Whole brain radiation 3 Gy/day for 10 days
Radiation: Radiation
Whole brain radiation

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • At least one measurable cancerous lesion in the brain from primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Must have received previous chemotherapy
  • Must be 18 years of age of greater
  • Must be Easter Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0, 1, 2
  • At least 2 weeks must have elapsed since any surgery
  • At least 4 weeks must have elapsed since any radiation to a non-CNS site
  • Must have adequate bone marrow, renal, and live capacities
  • Women must be of non-childbearing potential or practice adequate birth control
  • Males must practice adequate methods of birth control
  • Must sign written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Previous whole brain radiation therapy
  • Prior treatment with topotecan
  • Investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-live
  • Concomitant therapy with inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) or P-glycoprotein such as erlotinib or gefitinib
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiencies
  • Gastrointestinal conditions that affect GI absorption or motility
  • Uncontrolled emesis
  • Brain metastasis at time of initial diagnosis of NSCLC
  • History of other malignancy except in situ carcinoma of cervix; nonmelanomatous skin cancer, low grade prostate cancer
  • Pregnant or intending to become pregnant or intending to father a baby
  • Any severe concurrent medical condition that could affect compliance.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00390806

  Show 88 Study Locations
Sponsors and Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Investigators
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: GlaxoSmithKline
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00390806     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: HYT105962
Study First Received: October 19, 2006
Results First Received: March 8, 2013
Last Updated: December 5, 2013
Health Authority: Slovakia: State Institute for Drug Control
Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products
Poland:
Hungary: National Institute of Pharmacy
Russia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Canada: Health Canada
United States: Food and Drug Administration

Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
Brain metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Brain metastases brain tumor lung cancer oral chemotherapy HYCAMTIN topotecan NSCLC WBRT whole brain radiation

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Lung Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Brain Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bronchial Neoplasms
Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
Thoracic Neoplasms
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Lung Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes
Central Nervous System Neoplasms
Nervous System Neoplasms
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Topotecan
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
Topoisomerase Inhibitors
Enzyme Inhibitors
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Pharmacologic Actions
Antineoplastic Agents
Therapeutic Uses

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on July 20, 2014