| August 21, 2006 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| October 2004 |
| October 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
- Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretory Capacity After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Total and Incremental AUC T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Total AUC T0-T180 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| Beta-cell function is reflected by insulin response. Evolution of insulin secretion capacity will be assessed over 3 years, by using clamp tests and meal tests before treatment and after 18 and 36 months of treatment |
| Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00367055 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site |
- Median Change From Baseline in the Ratio M/I After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in the Insulin Secretion Capacity After an 18-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 36 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Change From Baseline in FBG at Month 36 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Months 18 and 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Index (HOMA-beta) After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Concentration Peak T0-T180 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Median Change From Baseline in Insulin Concentration Peak and Incremental Concentration Peak T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Total and Incremental AUC T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Change From Baseline in CPP Concentration Peak and Incremental Concentration Peak T0-T30 After a 36-month Treatment [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|
| insulin secretion and sensitivity at baseline,M18 and 36. HbA1c ( glycosylated haemoglobin) at baseline ,M18 and 36. C peptide at baseline, M18 and 36 |
| |
| Rosiglitazone-Metformin Combination Versus Metformin-Sulfonylurea Combination On Beta-Cell Function In Type 2 Diabetes |
| Comparison of the Action of the Rosiglitazone-metformin Fixed-dose Combination and of a Metformin-sulfonylurea Free Combination on the B-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Controlled With Metformin Alone. |
It has been shown in previous study that progressive glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of b-cell function, measured by the decrease in plasma insulin levels, irrespective of the therapy used (diet, sulfonylureas or metformin).There is growing evidence that thiazolidinediones could have a positive action on the b-cell function. But it has not yet been demonstrated that they could protect from a deterioration in insulin secretion in the long term. So, it appears interesting to study the long term evolution of the b-cell function and the possible protection with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes showing evidence of loss of b-cell function with metformin alone. |
| |
| Phase IV |
| Interventional |
| Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
| Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus |
- Drug: rosiglitazone-metformin
- Drug: Metformin
- Drug: metformin+ gliclazide
|
| |
| |
| |
| Completed |
| 84 |
| October 2008 |
| October 2008 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Males and females 40 to 75 years of age (inclusive at the time of screening)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by the WHO criteria, diagnosed for at least 1 year
- Subjects receiving 1.5 to 3g of metformin alone at a constant dose for at least 8 weeks prior to visit 1
- Patients with 6.5% < HbA1c > 8% at visit 1 and visit 2
- 25 < BMI < 35
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Patient with type 1 diabetes
- Treatment with other hypoglycaemic agents than metformin in the last 3 months
- FPG >200 mg/dL at visit 2
- Hypersensitivity to the studied treatments (rosiglitazone, metformin chlorhydrate, gliclazide)
- Congestive heart failure (NYHA class I to IV), unstable or severe angina, recent myocardial infarction
- Respiratory insufficiency
- Subjects who have required the use of insulin for glycaemic control in the past 6 months prior to visit 1 (except during pregnancy or acute episodes such as hospitalization, trauma or infection) or subjects with a history of metabolic acidosis including diabetic ketoacidosis
- Anemia defined by haemoglobin concentration <11.0 g/dL for males and <10.0 g/dL for females
- Renal disease or renal dysfunction, e.g. as suggested by serum creatinine levels ≥135.0 µmol/L in males and ≥110.0 µmol/L in females and/or creatinine clearance <40 mL/min
- Presence of clinically significant hepatic disease, with ALT, AST, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase >2.5 times the upper limit of the normal reference range
- Subjects with chronic diseases requiring periodic ot intermittent treatment with oral or IV corticosteroids
- Subjects receiving danazol, miconazole or phenylbutazone
- Active alcohol, drug or medication abuse within the last 6 months or any condition that would indicate the likelihood of poor subject compliance
- Women who are lactating, pregnant or planning to become pregnant
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at screening which, in the investigator's judgement, makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
- Use of any other investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to visit 1
- Subjects who receive or anticipate receiving radiocontrast dye during the study
|
| Both |
| 40 Years to 75 Years |
| No |
| Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects |
|
| |
| NCT00367055 |
| Study Director, GSK |
| 101765, AVAF4001 |
| GlaxoSmithKline |
|
| Study Director: |
GSK Clinical Trials, MD |
GlaxoSmithKline |
|
|
| GlaxoSmithKline |
| October 2009 |