Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Clonidine Versus Adenosine to Treat Neuropathic Pain
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00349921   Information provided by Wake Forest University
First Received: July 5, 2006   Last Updated: May 12, 2009   History of Changes

July 5, 2006
May 12, 2009
August 2004
 
Percent change in pain report [ Time Frame: 2 hours following injection of study medication ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Percent change in pain report 2 hour following injection of study medication.
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00349921 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Clonidine Versus Adenosine to Treat Neuropathic Pain
Clonidine Versus Adenosine to Treat Neuropathic Pain

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of clonidine and adenosine on nerve pain.

This study is part of a pain center grant that focuses on how pain, especially chronic neuropathic pain, alters the response to traditional and non-traditional analgesics (pain medications).

Clonidine—a drug commonly used to treat high blood pressure—has been shown to effectively treat neuropathic pain, is FDA-approved for administration via epidural (an injection given in the lower back), and is the third most commonly prescribed drug for chronic intrathecal (an injection into the cerebrospinal fluid) use in people with chronic pain.

Adenosine—a drug commonly administered intravenously (into a vein) to treat certain types of abnormal heart rhythms—has been found to reduce areas of allodynia (pain caused by a stimulus that does not normally cause pain) after intrathecal, but not intravenous administration in people with neuropathic pain.

Intrathecal clonidine relieves pain by actions on a2-adrenoceptors in the spinal cord, whereas adenosine relieves pain by actions on A1 adenosine receptors. Researchers believe that intrathecal adenosine and clonidine may prove to be excellent painkillers for nerve pain. Therefore, the goal of this study is to determine the effects of clonidine and adenosine on nerve pain.

After initial screening, baseline measurements, and training to learn to estimate pain accurately using thermal heat testing, a sample of spinal fluid will be taken from each participant. Participants then will be randomly chosen to receive either clonidine, adenosine, or placebo. After receiving the study medication, participants will be monitored, with their vital signs checked at 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes.

Duration of the study for participants is 2 weeks, and includes two visits to the research center, each lasting approximately 6 hours.

Phase II
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Placebo Control, Crossover Assignment
Pain
  • Drug: clonidine
  • Drug: adenosine
  • Other: placebo
  • Active Comparator: clonidine
  • Active Comparator: adenosine
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
28
January 2008
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), type I involving a lower extremity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to clonidine
  • Currently taking clonidine or other direct a2-adrenergic agonists, or taking cholinesterase inhibitors
  • Patients with any serious or unstable medical problems (heart, lung, liver, kidney, or nervous system disease)
Both
 
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00349921
James C. Eisenach, MD, Professor of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine
P01NS041386_TRIAL1, BG 04-280
Wake Forest University
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Principal Investigator: James C. Eisenach, M.D. Wake Forest University
Principal Investigator: Richard Rauck, M.D. The Center for Clinical Research
Wake Forest University
December 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP