Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00344968   Information provided by Alimera Sciences
First Received: June 26, 2006   Last Updated: January 2, 2008   History of Changes

June 26, 2006
January 2, 2008
September 2007
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Visual Acuity [ Time Frame: over 36 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00344968 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Retinal Thickness [ Time Frame: over 36 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Same as current
 
Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Compared to Sham Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
 

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal insert of fluocinolone acetonide for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

 
Phase III
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Dose Comparison, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Drug: fluocinolone acetonide
  • Drug: Fluocinolone Acetonide
  • Procedure: Standard of care laser photocoagulation
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
900
 
December 2009   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years with diabetic macular edema
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus types 1 or 2
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 19-68 letters
  • Retinal thickness > 250 micron by OCT
  • Investigator is comfortable deferring macular laser treatment for 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Glaucoma, ocular hypertension, IOP >21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at screening with IOP lowering agents
  • Retinal or choroidal neovascularization due to ocular conditions other than diabetic retinopathy
  • Prior intravitreal, subtenon, or periocular steroid therapy within 6 months
  • Any ocular surgery within the last 3 months
  • Retinal laser treatment within the last 3 months
  • History of uncontrolled IOP elevation with steroid use that did not respond to topical therapy
  • Any lens opacity which impairs visualization of the posterior pole
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00344968
Director, Scientific Affairs, Alimera Sciences, Inc.
C-01-05-001
Alimera Sciences
 
 
Alimera Sciences
January 2008

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP