Impact of An Emergency Response System on Anxiety and Health-Care Use
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
What to do after an elderly patient falls but is not seriously injured can be a very challenging decisions for the patient and the Emergency Physician. Unfortunately, homecare support is often unavailable for weeks. The patient and physician must then choose between discharge home without support, or hospitalization. An emergency response service (ERS) allows the patient to summon assistance from anywhere in their home, and may provide another option.
Objectives: To see how an ERS affects patients’ anxiety, fear of falling, and use of the health-care system after discharge. We will study patients over 70 years of age who have fallen but do not need to be hospitalized. Our belief is that the ERS will improve patient anxiety, and may prevent return visits to the Emergency or episodes of prolonged immobilization after a fall.
Methods: Patients agreeing to participate in the study will be assigned by chance to receive either current standard discharge care, or standard care plus the use of the emergency response system. Patients will be interviewed one month after discharge to compare the impact of the ERS. This study is a first step in deciding whether the ERS is a useful new technology.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Anxiety Falls Fear of Falling |
Device: Emergency Response System (Device) |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Clinical Trial To Asses The Impact of An Emergency Response System on Anxiety and Health-Care Use Among Older Emergency Patients After A Fall |
- Anxiety measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, at 1 month
- Fear of Falling, using Falls Efficacy Scale at 1 month
- Proportion who Returned to the Emergency Department by 2 months
- Proportion who are Hospitalized by 2 months
- Length of Stay by 2 months, in Days.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2002 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2004 |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 70 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater than or equal to 70 years.
- Primary complaint of a fall and discharged home directly from the Emergency Department -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Admitted to hospital
- Not independently living
- No Phone Line
- Unable to give informed consent
- Living outside geographic catchment area -
Contacts and Locations| Canada, Ontario | |
| Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center | |
| Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4S 3M5 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Jacques S. Lee, MD | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center |
More Information
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00330720 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 205-2002, PSIF Grant #02-13 |
| Study First Received: | May 26, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | May 26, 2006 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Keywords provided by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre:
|
Personal Emergency Response System Anxiety Fear of Falling RCT |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Anxiety Disorders Emergencies Mental Disorders Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013