Positron Emission Tomography Scan and CT Scan in Planning Radiation Therapy for Patients With Stage II or Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as positron emission tomography (PET) scan and CT scan, may help doctors plan radiation therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well a combined PET scan and CT scan works compared to a CT scan alone in planning radiation therapy for patients with stage II or stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Lung Cancer |
Procedure: computed tomography Procedure: positron emission tomography |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Primary Purpose: Diagnostic |
| Official Title: | Comparative Study of Gross Tumor Volume Definition With or Without PET Fusion for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma |
- Compare the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) or CT scan on contoured gross tumor volume vs CT scan alone by GTV (cm³) after completion of study treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) or CT scan on contoured gross tumor volume vs CT scan alone by number of contoured lymph nodes after completion of study treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) or CT scan on contoured gross tumor volume vs CT scan alone by location of involved lymph nodes after completion of study treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) or CT scan on contoured gross tumor volume vs CT scan alone by V20 after completion of study treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compare the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) or CT scan on contoured gross tumor volume vs CT scan alone by mean esophagus dose after completion of study treatment [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Rate of elective nodal failures as assessed by failure in previously uninvolved regional lymph nodes at 2 years [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 48 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2006 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine the impact of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT fusion scan and CT scan alone, by comparing gross tumor volume (GTV) contours and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment plans using 2 separate data sets (PET/CT fusion scan and CT scan only), in patients with stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer who are planning to undergo radiotherapy.
- Determine the impact of PET on GTV (cm^3), number of involved nodes, location of involved nodes, and dosimetric measures of normal tissue toxicity (mean lung dose, V20, and mean esophageal dose).
Secondary
- Determine the rate of elective nodal failures (nodal failures in regions that are not intentionally irradiated to definitive doses [i.e., ipsilateral hilum, mediastinum, or ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa]).
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs no).
Patients undergo a combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan. Patients also undergo a CT scan alone. A single three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plan is generated from the combined PET/CT scan results. A single 3DCRT plan using the planning target volume is derived from the CT scan only.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 1 year, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 48 patients will be accrued for this study.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Stage IIA/IIB or stage IIIA/IIIB disease
- Planning to undergo radiotherapy
- Local or regional nodal recurrence after surgery allowed
- No malignant pleural effusion
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Zubrod performance status 0-2
- Negative pregnancy test
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- Concurrent neoadjuvant and/or concurrent chemotherapy allowed
- No concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Contacts and Locations| United States, Missouri | |
| Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital - Saint Louis | |
| St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas | |
| Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390 | |
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center | |
| Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792-6164 | |
| Canada | |
| McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University | |
| Montreal, Canada, H2W 1S6 | |
| Study Chair: | Jeffrey Bradley, MD | Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical Center |
| Investigator: | Jacqueline Brunetti, MD | Sister Patricia Lynch Regional Cancer Center at Holy Name Hospital |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00310219 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CDR0000465501, RTOG-0515 |
| Study First Received: | March 29, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | October 27, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):
|
stage II non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer recurrent non-small cell lung cancer |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Lung Neoplasms Carcinoma, Bronchogenic Bronchial Neoplasms Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
Thoracic Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013