Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00299429   Information provided by University of Leipzig
First Received: September 9, 2005   Last Updated: July 7, 2008   History of Changes

September 9, 2005
July 7, 2008
January 2003
July 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Major adverse cardiac events [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Major adverse cardiac events
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00299429 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Perioperative complications [ Time Frame: 30 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • CCS-Classification [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • cost-effectiveness [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Perioperative complications
  • CCS-Classification
  • cost-effectiveness
 
MIDCAB Versus DES in Proximal LAD Lesions
Randomised Comparison of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Proximal Stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention with a sirolimus-coated stent compared to minimally invasive bypass surgery in patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary arteries in terms of non-inferiority of an end point combining mortality, acute myocardial infarction and rate of reintervention of the target vessel within one year.

 
Phase IV
Interventional
Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Procedure: Stenting and minimally invasive bypass surgery
 
Thiele H, Neumann-Schniedewind P, Jacobs S, Boudriot E, Walther T, Mohr FW, Schuler G, Falk V. Randomized comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery versus sirolimus-eluting stenting in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 23;53(25):2324-31.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
130
July 2008
July 2008   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Single-vessel disease of the proximal LAD with a stenosis > 50% (multivessel disease only if further coronary vessel stenoses do not require treatment)
  2. Patients with angina pectoris (CCS 1-4)
  3. Asymptomatic patients if clear signs of ischemia in the segments supplied by the LAD as assessed by bicycle ergometry or treadmill and/or scintigraphically and/or stress echo
  4. Patients for whom both methods of treatment are equally possible
  5. Consensus between the cardiac surgeon and the cardiologist that both inclusion and exclusion criteria are met in the selected case
  6. Informed consent of the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients < 18 years
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Previous coronary artery bypass surgery
  4. Concomitant diseases that lead to a greater risk for each of the treatment strategies
  5. Significant peripheral arterial occlusive disease
  6. Concomitant disease with limited life expectancy (e.g. malignant tumours that have not been curatively treated)
  7. Objective follow-up examination not possible due to physical or mental handicap
  8. Participation in another study.

Angiographical exclusion criteria:

  1. Left main stem stenosis
  2. Multivessel disease for which surgical or interventional therapy on other vessel areas is required.
  3. Diagonal/septal branch > 1.5 mm, which might be compromised by a stent
  4. Need for acute intervention (e.g. acute myocardial infarction)
  5. Total occlusion of the LAD
Both
18 Years and older
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Germany
 
NCT00299429
Dr. Holger Thiele, University of Leipzig - Heart Center
2-Thiele
University of Leipzig
Cordis Medizinische Apparate GmbH
Principal Investigator: Holger Thiele, MD University of Leipzig
University of Leipzig
March 2007

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP