Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip Versus Standard Approach
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in terms of length of hospital stay and post-operative outcomes between patients whose total hip replacement surgery is performed with a minimally invasive versus standard surgical approach.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis |
Procedure: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty Procedure: Standard |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) |
| Official Title: | Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip: A Randomized Study |
- Length of Stay [ Time Frame: Post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- WOMAC SF-36 Harris Hip Get up and Go Operative Details Post-operative Complications [ Time Frame: Pre-op, 6, 12, 24 months post-op ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MIS
Minimally invasive hip surgery
|
Procedure: minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty
Other Name: non applicable
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard
Standard approach to hip surgery
|
Procedure: Standard
standard approach hip surgery
Other Name: non applicable
|
Detailed Description:
Traditional techniques for total hip arthroplasty (THA) require complete visualization of the acetabulum and proximal femur since anatomic landmarks are crucial for correct orientation of the prosthetic components. All surgeons are taught that a wide surgical exposure is one of the most important factors in performing successful THA. Traditionally, it was impossible to achieve accurate fixation and orientation of the components without complete visualization of bony landmarks. These extensile exposures facilitate accurate implant alignment, but at the expense of more extensive soft tissue dissection. Little clinical research has been undertaken to relate the surgical approach to postoperative complications or patient function. Furthermore, despite the good overall results of THA, the recovery time to improved function can be lengthy. Blood loss is expected to be directly related to the extent of the surgical exposure and to influence patients outcomes. Based upon these facts, an important principle of arthroplasty surgery is to minimize the amount of soft tissue trauma while being able to achieve the surgical goal of reconstructing the arthritic hip joint. By definition, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures result in less soft tissue disruption, which in turn should reduce pain, expedite healing, decrease recovery time, and potentially reduce the number of associated complications.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
BMI > 30 kg/m2 No prior ipsilateral hip surgery Osteoarthritis
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with grossly distorted bony anatomy whereby standard implants are contraindicated; i.e. congenital dysplasia of the hip, proximal femoral abnormalities, etc
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00261040 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | OHREB 2003211-01H |
| Study First Received: | November 30, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | October 24, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Keywords provided by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute:
|
Osteoarthritis Total Hip Arthroplasty Minimally Invasive Surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Osteoarthritis Arthritis Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013