Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of once-daily (QD) treatment with dexlansoprazole modified release (MR) 60 mg or 90 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Esophagitis, Reflux Esophagitis, Peptic |
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR Drug: Lansoprazole |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-390MR (60 mg Once- Daily [QD] and 90 mg QD) and an Active Comparator, Lansoprazole (30 mg QD) on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis |
- Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis (EE) by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. [ Time Frame: 8 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
- Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method. [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
- Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. [ Time Frame: 8 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of erosive esophagitis as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
- Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method. [ Time Frame: 8 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy for Change in LA Esophagitis Classification Grades C and D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
- Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analyses. [ Time Frame: 4 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
- Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method. [ Time Frame: 4 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy was analyzed for change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, or D to healed. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed.
| Enrollment: | 2038 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD |
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR
Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks.
Other Names:
|
| Experimental: Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD |
Drug: Dexlansoprazole MR
Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: Lansoprazole 30 mg QD |
Drug: Lansoprazole
Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks.
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8-week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg QD and 90 mg QD) with that of lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last 8 weeks.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori.
- Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics
- Use of antacids [except for study supplied Gelusil®]
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners)
- Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
- History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
- Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition.
- History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer.
- Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the screening endoscopy
Contacts and Locations
Show 140 Study Locations| Study Chair: | Medical Director | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00251693 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | T-EE04-084, U1111-1113-9373 |
| Study First Received: | November 8, 2005 |
| Results First Received: | February 20, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | February 1, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.:
|
Erosive Esophagitis |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Esophagitis Esophagitis, Peptic Esophageal Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Digestive System Diseases Gastroenteritis Peptic Ulcer Lansoprazole |
Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Ulcer Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013