Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation in Tetraplegia
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00202631   Information provided by South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust
First Received: September 12, 2005   Last Updated: November 24, 2006   History of Changes

September 12, 2005
November 24, 2006
June 2002
 
  • Tidal Volume
  • Peak Expiratory Flow
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00202631 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Expired CO2 levels
  • Vital Capacity
Same as current
 
Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation in Tetraplegia
Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation to Augment Breathing in Tetraplegia

People with high spinal lesions are at risk of respiratory complications because they have partial or complete paralysis of breathing muscles. Previous work has shown that tetraplegic lung volumes can be increased by using abdominal FES during expiration. The technique is attractive because it is non-invasive, painless in tetraplegia and completely reversible. It may provide a treatment for augmenting the patient’s breathing both in the acute presentation of spinal injury (when half of cervical injuries require ventilation) and in long term management of tetraplegia and high paraplegia. We propose a pilot study in a small group of subjects to see if the technique is feasible from both a clinical and engineering viewpoint. The aims of the study are: 1)To examine the effects of abdominal FES on lung mechanics and gas exchange in tetraplegic subjects. 2)To optimise the stimulation pattern and intensity via electronic stimulators and to design a trigger to allow the FES to follow the subject’s own breathing cycle automatically.

Patients with high spinal cord injury (SCI) usually have paralysed intercostal muscles and rely on diaphragm function alone for respiration. They have low tidal volumes and inadequate cough. These patients are vulnerable to respiratory complications in the immediate post-injury phase and remain at life-long risk of chest problems. Usual treatments include intensive physiotherapy and intermittent positive pressure ventilation to augment the patient’s tidal volume and to help clear excess secretions.

Tidal volumes can also be increased by electrical stimulation of the surface of abdominal muscles during expiration. During stimulation the patient expires below functional residual capacity (the amount of air left after normal expiration). The natural elasticity of the chest wall then causes a recoil increase in the size of the next inspired breath. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the abdominal muscles is theoretically an attractive technique to augment respiration. It is non-invasive, it mimics natural physiological processes and tetraplegic patients cannot sense abdominal discomfort. There are potential applications in acute SCI patients to prevent the need for artificial ventilation and to aid ventilator weaning. The technique could also be used in chronically injured patients to augment ventilation.

Clinical staff at the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit have collaborated extensively with engineering and bioengineering teams from Glasgow University and the University of Strathclyde in the use of FES in SCI. FES is already being used successfully in the Unit for paraplegic cycling and upper limb exercise in tetraplegia. We have performed abdominal FES on one SCI subject with complete diaphragm paralysis and produced a tidal volume of one hundred millilitres (McLean and Hunt, unpublished observation).

Before starting a large scale project it is important to confirm whether we can reliably reproduce at least some of the findings of Stanic et al. It would be very interesting if we could show any change in gas exchange as well as simply increasing tidal volume. Engineering issues include optimisation and programming of the FES stimulus. We propose a pilot study in QENSIU to establish whether the technique is of practical benefit to spinal cord injured patients.

 
Interventional
Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Uncontrolled, Single Group Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
  • Tetraplegia
  • Spinal Cord Injury
Device: Surface Functional Electrical Stimulation
 
Stanic U, Kandare F, Jaeger R, Sorli J. Functional electrical stimulation of abdominal muscles to augment tidal volume in spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000 Mar;8(1):30-4.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
4
November 2006
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cervical spinal cord injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subject must not be ventilator-dependent
Both
 
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United Kingdom
 
NCT00202631
 
AbdomGlasgow
South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust
 
Principal Investigator: Alan N McLean, MRCP Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Glasgow
Principal Investigator: Kenneth J Hunt, BSc, PhD, DSc Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Glasgow
South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust
November 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP