|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsors and Collaborators: |
University of Copenhagen National Health Insurance foundation Dan Dental, Denmark University of Aarhus Gothenborg University,Sweden Huddinge Faculty,Stockholm,Sweden Uppsala FolkTandvård,Sweden Malmö Dental school,Sweden |
| Information provided by: | University of Copenhagen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00187837 |
Purpose
Brief summary
Background:
A large proportion of dental practice involves the treatment of caries in the permanent dentition. In USA alone tooth related pain is annually responsible for 15 billions days lost through sickness. We do not know whether a stepwise excavation is better or worse compared with one final completed excavation in adults with deep caries with or without pain. A deep carious lesion is in the risk zone of being pulpal exposed during excavation.
Aim:
The aim of the CAP-1-trial is to investigate the beneficial effects of stepwise excavation during two visits versus óne completed excavation of deep caries in permanent teeth with or without pain.
Patients:
Consecutive patients contacting the units involved in the CAP trial for the treatment of deep caries. The trial will comprise 300 patients.
Design:
CAP-1-trial is a randomised patient- and observer-blinded multicenter trial, with two parallel intervention groups. Patients that fulfill the inclusions criteria and none of the exclusions criteria, will be centrally bloc-randomised in Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen DK, and stratified by age and pain. Allocation ratio is 1:1.
Interventions and products:
Patients are allocated for stepwise excavation in two visits or final excavation in one visit. The patients will not be informed about the result of the randomisation, i.e. the type of intervention. Therefore, all patients will be contacted for two visits. The second visit in the stepwise excavation group wil be used for the second and final excavation, and for the performance of a permanent restoration. The second visit in the one step excavation group will solely be used for the performance of a permanent restoration. The interventions in both groups are completed following 8-10 weeks after the randomisation.
A temporary calcium hydroxide based material is used in both groups (Dycal®). The temporary restoration material, glas-ionomer cement is used (Ketac Molar®) in between visits, and a resin material is used for the final restoration(Herculite®).
| Condition | Intervention |
|
Deep Caries Lesions Reversible Pulpitis |
Procedure: Stepwise Excavation, one completed excavation |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study |
| Official Title: | The CAP-1 Trial: Effect of Stepwise Versus One Completed Excavation in Deep Caries in Permanent Teeth: A Randomised, Patient - and Observer-Blinded Multicenter Trial |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 300 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2005 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
![]() |
Show Detailed Description |
Eligibility
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
NB: Need to mark 'No' for all criteria
Contacts and Locations| Denmark, Copenhagen N | |||||
| School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences | |||||
| Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark, 2200 | |||||
| University of Copenhagen |
| National Health Insurance foundation |
| Dan Dental, Denmark |
| University of Aarhus |
| Gothenborg University,Sweden |
| Huddinge Faculty,Stockholm,Sweden |
| Uppsala FolkTandvård,Sweden |
| Malmö Dental school,Sweden |
| Study Director: | Lars Bjørndal | University of Copenhagen |
More Information
| Study ID Numbers: | 10001 |
| First Received: | September 9, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | May 7, 2007 |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00187837 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: National Board of Health; Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board |
|
|
|