Biopace Study: Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate if patients with a standard indication for permanent ventricular pacing, left ventricular ejection fraction without limit, or any QRS duration will profit from the prevention of ventricular desynchronisation.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Atrioventricular Block Ventricular Dysfunction |
Device: Biventricular Pacing Device: RV Pacing |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block in Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization |
- Patient survival time after hardware-randomization: total mortality [ Time Frame: Event driven ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Death due to cardiovascular causes, as classified by the independent Event Adjudication Committee (IEAC) (cf. 2.6.2) [ Time Frame: Event driven ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Functional capacity as measured by the distance covered in the 6-minute walk test [ Time Frame: 1 and 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Health related Quality of Life measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire© [ Time Frame: 1 and 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Rate and duration of hospitalizations for deterioration of heart failure [ Time Frame: Event driven ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Rate and duration of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events [ Time Frame: Event driven ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Rate and duration of hospitalizations for any reason [ Time Frame: Event driven ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Cardiac structure and function (echocardiographic analysis according to the echo core laboratory results): [ Time Frame: 12 & 24 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Implantation procedure [ Time Frame: Implantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]AEs
- left ventricular lead [ Time Frame: study duration ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]AEs
- all leads [ Time Frame: study duration ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]AEs
- Successful implantation of the left ventricular lead (St. Jude Medical) [ Time Frame: Implantation ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Performance of lead
- Chronic atrial fibrillation (defined as presence of atrial fibrillation in two subsequent ECG´s/visits) [ Time Frame: Study duration ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 1830 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2014 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: RV Pacing
Standard Pacemaker implant
|
Device: RV Pacing
Standard Pacemaker implant
|
|
Experimental: Biventricular Pacing
Biventircular Pacemaker implant
|
Device: Biventricular Pacing
Biventricular Pacemaker implant
|
Detailed Description:
The study will be performed as a controlled, single-blind, international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel group design.
In order to pragmatically examine the effectiveness of biventricular pacing in patients with an indication for ventricular pacing, the study group with biventricular pacing is compared to a control group with standard pacemakers which only allow univentricular (right ventricular) stimulation, as it has been the standard outside of clinical studies until so far.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Presence of an indication for ventricular pacing according to the actual guidelines for the implantation of cardiac pacemakers and a need for frequent (or even permanent) ventricular pacing for:
- Permanent 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV)-block or
- Intermittent 3rd degree AV-block in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or
- 2nd degree AV-block type Mobitz II in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or
- 2nd degree AV-block type Mobitz I (if indicated) in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or
- 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms and indication for ventricular pacing (includes indication for ventricular pacing based on long HV interval measured during invasive electrophysiological testing) or
- Sick-sinus-syndrome with symptomatic sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest as primary indication for device implantation in combination with long 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or
- Chronic (permanent) atrial fibrillation (flutter or tachycardia) with a spontaneous heart (ventricular) rate at rest ≤ 60/min or
- Chronic (permanent) atrial fibrillation (flutter or tachycardia) with a spontaneous heart (ventricular) rate at rest ≤ 75/min, if initiation or increase of pharmacological treatment with a relevant heart rate lowering effect (negative chronotropic effect) is planned for the time after pacemaker implantation (i.e. ß-blockers for heart failure and rate control)
- Patients scheduled for AV node ablation
- Any QRS duration and morphology
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without limit as measured by echocardiography (in at least one plane, either 4- or 2-chamber or apical long axis view)
- Signed written informed consent of the patient or a first-degree relative for study participation after informing the patient/relative about the risks and the aim of the study
- Willingness and ability to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations.
- Absence of an implanted ventricular pacing device (patients with atrial pacemakers and new need for ventricular pacing may be included)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator or consideration for implantation of an ICD due to arrhythmia indication. However, ICD implant for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with LVEF ≤ 35 % (in accordance with the actual guidelines for the implantation of arrhythmia devices[LVEF < 30%] and in accordance with the results of the SCD-Heft study [LVEF < 35%) will be allowed.
- Implanted ventricular pacing device
- Status 1 for cardiac transplantation and likelihood to receive transplantation within 2 years (these patients would not be expected to fulfill the follow-up requirements as outlined in this protocol)
- Evidence of acute left ventricular dysfunction and high probability for its reversibility (e.g. acute myocarditis, tachycardiomyopathy)
- Implanted prosthetic tricuspid valve
- Severe musculoskeletal disorder(s)
- Age below 18 years
- Current or planned pregnancy in the next 6 months
- Current or recent (within the past 30 days) participation in any other clinical investigation
- Life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Patient's inability to independently comprehend and complete the Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg | |
| Marburg, Germany, 35033 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Reinhard Funck, MD | Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany |
| Study Chair: | Jean-Jacques Blanc, Prof. | Hôpital Cavale Blanche, Brest, France |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | St. Jude Medical |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00187278 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CR03006HF |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | December 12, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by St. Jude Medical:
|
Standard pacing indication |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atrioventricular Block Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Ventricular Dysfunction Heart Block |
Arrhythmias, Cardiac Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013