Comparison of Physiotherapy Versus Home Exercise Following Hip Replacement Surgery
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
University of British Columbia
Information provided by:
University of British Columbia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00175448
First received: September 11, 2005
Last updated: September 24, 2008
Last verified: September 2005
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Outpatient Physiotherapy versus a Self-Administered Home Exercise Program Following Discharge Home from Total Hip Arthroplasty
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Arthritis Arthroscopic Hip Surgery |
Procedure: physiotherapy |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized Controlled Trial of Outpatient Physiotherapy Versus a Self-Administered Home Exercise Program Following Discharge Home From Total Hip Arthroplasty |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by University of British Columbia:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Physical function at 16 weeks post THA in patients who received outpatient physiotherapy following discharge home compared to unsupervised self- directed exercises alone (as measured by the WOMAC). [ Time Frame: 16 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Does outpatient physiotherapy result in superior outcomes (final outcome) at 1 and 2 years post THA? [ Time Frame: 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Does outpatient physiotherapy, compared to a self-directed exercise program, result in greater improvement in: [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- generic health-related QOL (SF-36) and (HUI3) [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- pain and stiffness (WOMAC pain and stiffness) [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- activities of daily living (FSI) [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patient satisfaction (Brigham and Women's patient satisfaction) [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- objective physical function (TUG, Harris Hip, Gait Lab) [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- What is the marginal cost effectiveness of outpatient physiotherapy versus self-directed exercises? [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- How does the recovery over time compare between programs (trajectory of recovery) ? [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- What is the difference in musculoskeletal adverse event rate (ie dislocation)? [ Time Frame: Unspecified ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 144 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | December 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Intervention Details:
-
Procedure: physiotherapy
See Detailed Description.
Eligibility| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- primary THA (cemented or cementless)
- preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (primary or secondary)
- meets objective discharge-to-home test following hip replacement
- ability to speak English and reply to questionnaires written in English
- ability to provide informed consent
- may include patients presenting for their second primary hip arthroplasty
Discharge to Home Criteria
- independent supine-to-sit transfer
- independent sit-to-stand transfer
- walk with walking aid 30 meters
- ascend and descend 3 stairs
- deemed medically fit and safe for home environment by surgeon/nursing/PT
Exclusion Criteria:
- surgery as part of a workers' compensation claim
- arthroplasty performed for trauma or following open reduction and internal fixation, malignancy or inflammatory arthropathy
- intra-operative complication of fracture or sciatic nerve injury
- procedure requiring complex surgical approach other than posterior or anterolateral (ie trochanteric osteotomy/micro 2 incision approach)
- indications for additional primary or revision arthroplasty within the time frame of the study (24 months) in other hip or knee joints which would adversely affect quality of life and functional scores pertaining to the joint of interest
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr. Nelson Greidanus, University of British Columbia |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00175448 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | C02-0249 |
| Study First Received: | September 11, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | September 24, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arthritis Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013