Prophylactic Antibiotics in Measles
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Objective It is the objective to test whether the use of prophylactic antibiotics in measles infection will reduce the incidence of post-measles pneumonia and/or admissions to hospital with 50%. The possible impact on other complications of severe measles will also be measured.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-Measles Pneumonia Measles |
Drug: Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prophylactic Antibiotics in Measles Infection. A Community-Based Randomised Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial in Guinea-Bissau |
- Post-measles pneumonia
- Admission to hospital
- Weight gain or loss during the first month of infection
- Diarrhoea
- Severe fever
- Oral thrush
- Stomatitis
- Conjunctivitis
- Otitis media
| Estimated Enrollment: | 218 |
| Study Start Date: | January 1998 |
| Study Completion Date: | October 2001 |
| Primary Completion Date: | October 2001 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Background The case-fatality rate of measles in developing countries is still high, particularly in infants. It is estimated that measles is responsible for more than one million deaths per year, and that most of these deaths are due to complications of the disease.
Most of the severe complications of measles in developing countries are due to secondary bacterial and viral infections causing pneumonia and diarrhea.
A study from the fifties showed no benefit from treating measles cases prophylactically with antibiotics, and this together with the fear for developing antibiotic resistance has given rise to the dogma that it is harmful to give prophylactic antibiotics in measles infection.
A more recent study from Niakhar, a rural area of Senegal, has shown that children treated with prophylactic antibiotics had a lower frequency of respiratory complications. In 1987 it was decided that all children younger than 3 years of age seen within the first 2 weeks of the onset of measles symptoms should be treated with the antibiotic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 7 days irrespective of whether they had signs of bacterial infection at the time of clinical examinations. Children younger than 3 years of age who had received prophylactic antibiotics were less likely to have respiratory symptoms on days 8 to 15 of illness than children of the same age group who had not received antibiotics because they were seen for the first time on days 8 to 15 (relative risk, 0.37 (0.15 to 0.94)). Further, the case-fatality rates adjusted for age declined 2-fold between 1983-1986 and between 1987-1991 (mortality ratio, 0.41 (0.21 to 0.81)).
As this study was not an unbiased evaluation, it would be desirable to do a randomized doubleblind placebocontrolled trial of prophylactic use of antibiotics in measles infection. This could potentially prevent a large number of measles-related complications and deaths.
Participation and randomization Measles cases included in the study will receive treatment with either co-trimoxazole or the identical looking placebo. The co-trimoxazole and the placebo will be packed in identical looking sacks marked with a randomization number. The code will be broken only after the end of the study period.
Informed consent will be obtained from the parents or guardians. It will be explained that the study will examine whether antibiotics can prevent later complications, it is not known whether this is indeed the case. Therefore there will be one group receiving active treatment, and another group receiving placebo, and we do not know to which group the measles case belongs. It will also be explained if they do not want to participate, the management of the measles case will be as otherwise done in the study area.
Measles cases not included in the study will receive standard treatment.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 3 Months and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- A clinical diagnosis of probable measles in the prodromal phase or within the first seven days of the onset of the rash
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and nursing women
- Children less than 2 months old
- Children who need urgent referral to the hospital, children with bacterial infections of the lung, or children with another bacterial infection requiring systemic antibiotic treatment.
Contacts and Locations| Guinea-Bissau | |
| Bandim Health Project | |
| Bissau, Apartado 861, Guinea-Bissau, 1004 Bissau Codex | |
| Study Director: | PETER AABY, MSc, Dr Med | Bandim Health Project |
| Principal Investigator: | MAY-LILL GARLY, PHD, DTM&H | Bandim Health Project |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr. May-Lill Garly, PhD DTM&H, Bandim Health Project |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00168532 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ProfAnt-BHP-1996 |
| Study First Received: | September 9, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | February 25, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | Guinea-Bissau: Ministry of Health Gambia: MRC Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Bandim Health Project:
|
Prophylactic antibiotics Measles Pneumonia Post-measles pneumonia |
Low income country Guinea-Bissau Bandim Health Project |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Measles Pneumonia Morbillivirus Infections Paramyxoviridae Infections Mononegavirales Infections RNA Virus Infections Virus Diseases Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Tract Infections Anti-Bacterial Agents Sulfamethoxazole Trimethoprim |
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary Renal Agents Antimalarials Antiprotozoal Agents Antiparasitic Agents Folic Acid Antagonists Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013