Impact of Immunosuppressive Regimens on Polyomavirus-related Transplant Nephropathy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of this study is to characterize and evaluate risk factors of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) including the impact of three immunosuppressive regimens.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Polyomavirus Infections |
Drug: CsA + MMF Drug: Tacr + MMF Drug: Tacr + MMF with conversion to Tacr + ERL |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Prospective Randomized Study to Characterize Risk Factors of Polyomavirus-related Transplant Nephropathy and the Impact of Three Immunosuppressive Regimens on Nephropathy Incidence |
- incidence of polyomavirus associated transplant nephropathy (PVN) [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- incidence of polyoma viremia [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- urine polyomavirus concentration within the first two years post-transplant [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patients' and grafts' survival [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- incidence of acute rejections [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- transplant function 1 and 2 years post-transplant [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- comparison of urine cytology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quantitative data regarding diagnosis of PVN [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- predictive value of immune parameters prognostically relevant for acute or chronic rejection [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- side effects of immunosuppressive drugs [ Time Frame: 2 years posttransplant ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 108 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Immunosuppression with CsA/MMF
|
Drug: CsA + MMF
according to the Giessen protocol
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Immunosuppression with Tacr/MMF
|
Drug: Tacr + MMF
according to Giessen protocol
|
|
Active Comparator: 3
Immunosuppression with Tacr/MMF with change from MMF to Everolimus after completion of posttransplant wound healing
|
Drug: Tacr + MMF with conversion to Tacr + ERL
according to Giessen protocol
|
Detailed Description:
Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an emerging cause of renal transplant loss. Until now the risk factors of PVN are poorly understood. Tacrolimus (Tacr) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are thought to be associated with a higher risk of developing PVN. However, the way in which Tacr or MMF might enhance the susceptibility for PVN remains largely unknown. In this prospective study we will analyze whether differences in immune-reactivity patterns (Th1, Th2, B cell and monocyte responses, sCD30, immunoregulatory antibodies) of renal transplant patients induced by different immunosuppressive regimens (cyclosporine A [CsA]/MMF, Tacr/MMF, Tacr/MMF with conversion to Tacr/Everolimus [ERL]) or by cytokine promoter gene polymorphisms may account for the different risks of developing PVN.
Comparison(s): renal transplant recipients stratified according to their relative immunological risk (group 1: low risk (primary recipients without pre-immunization [PRA < 5%]); group 2: moderate risk (group 2a: primary recipients with low pre-immunization [PRA 6-20%]; group 2b: re-transplanted patients); group 3: very high risk (re-transplanted patients with a history of vascular rejection or recipients of a first graft with high pre-immunization [PRA > 20%]) randomized to be treated with one of three immunosuppressive regimens (CsA/MMF, Tacr/MMF, Tacr/MMF with subsequent conversion to Tacr/ERL).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cadaver kidney and living donor kidney transplant recipients
- Primary, secondary, and tertiary transplant recipients
- Pre-immunized and not pre-immunized transplant recipients
- Age > 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications against administration of one of the four study drugs
- History of severe gastrointestinal morbidity
- Age < 18 years
- Pregnant or breast feeding women
- Rejection of effective contraceptive methods with young women
- Combined kidney and islet cell transplantation
Contacts and Locations| Germany | |
| Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen | |
| Giessen, Germany, 35392 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Rolf Weimer, Prof., MD | University Giessen, Internal Medicine |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Prof. Dr. Rolf Weimer, University of Giessen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00160966 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | NTx-PV-002 |
| Study First Received: | September 8, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | July 2, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by University of Giessen:
|
kidney transplantation polyoma virus associated transplant nephropathy tacrolimus mycophenolate mofetil everolimus |
cyclosporin A BK virus PCR viruria screening BK polyomavirus immunosuppression |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Kidney Diseases Polyomavirus Infections Urologic Diseases DNA Virus Infections Virus Diseases |
Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013