Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjunct to Propofol-Assisted Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
We, the investigators at Queen's University, propose to conduct a randomized, double-blind, feasibility trial comparing low-dose ketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to Emergency Department procedural sedation with propofol. The outcomes of interest will be safety, with respect to hemodynamic and respiratory adverse effects, as well as efficacy, with respect to adequacy of sedation and analgesia, recovery profiles and patient/physician satisfaction. Our hypothesis, based on a review of existing anesthesia literature, is that low-dose ketamine may be a safer and more efficacious alternative to fentanyl when used as an adjunct to propofol-assisted procedural sedation.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Fractures Dislocations Abscess Anesthesia Analgesia |
Drug: ketamine |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjunct to Propofol-Assisted Emergency Department Procedural Sedation |
- The primary outcome of interest in this study will be the incidence and severity of adverse events during procedural sedation, characterized by using an ordered, four-point categorical scale of airway, ventilatory and hemodynamic adverse events.
- The secondary outcome measures of this study will be: the incidence and type of individual adverse events listed in the primary outcome
- the dose of propofol administered during the procedure
- times from study drug administration to: beginning of procedure, end of procedure, recovery of appropriate verbal response, Emergency Department discharge, incidence of any adverse event(s)
- successful completion of the procedure
- the operator’s rating of the sedation
- incidence of any adverse drug reaction
- patient visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of analgesia, amnesia, and general satisfaction.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 124 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2006 |
This initial, single-centre feasibility study will have the following specific objectives:
- Comparison of low-dose ketamine with fentanyl as adjunct to propofol-assisted emergency department procedural sedation, with respect to safety and efficacy parameters;
- Pilot of a blinded emergency department sedation and analgesia protocol, including drug doses, concealment techniques, and data collection tools, to determine the feasibility of a subsequent larger, multi-centre trial;
- Determination of the true incidence of the primary outcome measures in the study population, using the study drug administration doses and protocol, such that an accurate sample size may be estimated for a future, adequately-powered, multi-centre trial;
- Validation of a newly-developed ordered, categorical rating scale for the reporting of respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events occurring during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 14 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals presenting or referred to the Emergency Department at Kingston General Hospital with a fracture or dislocation requiring manipulation under procedural sedation; or abscess requiring incision and drainage under procedural sedation.
- Ability to provide informed consent according to institutional requirements.
- Ability to comprehend and communicate in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 14 or > 65 years
- Any history of significant active cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, as determined by patient history, chart review, or emergency physician.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification greater than class II.
- Body mass > 130 kg.
- A history of physician-diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea.
- Chronic use of opioids including methadone and buprenorphine.
- A self-reported history of recent substance abuse or prior opioid dependence.
- Acute intoxication with drugs or alcohol, based on the judgement of the attending physician.
- A history of psychotic disorders, as reported by subjects or identified on review of the medical records.
- A known history of allergy or sensitivity to any study medication.
Contacts and Locations| Canada, Ontario | |
| Queen's University | |
| Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Marco LA Sivilotti, MD, MSc | Queen's University |
More Information
No publications provided by Queen's University
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00137085 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | PSI R04-43 |
| Study First Received: | August 26, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | June 13, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada |
Keywords provided by Queen's University:
|
procedural sedation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Abscess Dislocations Emergencies Fractures, Bone Suppuration Infection Inflammation Pathologic Processes Wounds and Injuries Disease Attributes Ketamine Fentanyl Propofol Anesthetics, Dissociative Anesthetics, Intravenous |
Anesthetics, General Anesthetics Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists Excitatory Amino Acid Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Adjuvants, Anesthesia |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013