Comparing Asthma Action Plans for Pediatric Asthma
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the relative effectiveness of two asthma action plans (pictorial versus written) in terms of asthma action plan knowledge, medication use, and family satisfaction with asthma education.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Asthma |
Device: Pictorial asthma action plan |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Relative Effectiveness of Pictorial and Written Asthma Action Plans for Pediatric Asthma |
- after one month: scores on the Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview and Family Satisfaction Survey, and mean daily adherence to controller medication and total number of puffs of rescue medication inhaled
| Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2005 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | November 2005 |
Asthma medical regimens are complex for families, requiring changes in the types and amounts of medication based on the frequency and intensity of symptoms. Written asthma action plans (AAP’s) are commonly used to provide a set of instructions to help parents and children implement these complicated regimens. However, written AAP’s require substantial literacy levels, so for younger children, low-literacy families, or non-English speaking families, a pictorial version of the AAP may be more understandable and useful. The study aims to validate a newly developed, fully pictorial AAP in terms of its relative impact on parent- and child-reported knowledge of the action plan, medication use, and parent- and child-reported satisfaction, when compared to a standard-care written AAP.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 6 Years to 18 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who are new patients
- Receive a diagnosis of persistent asthma
- Are in need of an asthma action plan
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with intermittent asthma
- An established patient who already has an asthma action plan
- Not English or Spanish speaking
Contacts and Locations| United States, Missouri | |
| The Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics | Recruiting |
| Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108 | |
| Contact: Jade A Bender, BA 816-234-3193 jabender@cmh.edu | |
| Sub-Investigator: Jade A Bender, BA | |
| Principal Investigator: | Christina D Adams, PhD | The Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00136305 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 04 08-102E, KBR 01.4182 |
| Study First Received: | August 26, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | June 6, 2006 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City:
|
pediatric asthma asthma action plans patient education medication adherence |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Asthma Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases |
Respiratory Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 13, 2013