Method of Oxygen Delivery and the Effect on Transcutaneous PaCO2
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Infants of < 1500 grams of birth weight who require a > 1 week mechanical ventilation (breathing machine) or CPAP [continuous positive airway pressure] (oxygen at a high flow through the nose) may have prolonged oxygen requirements. The nasal cannula (oxygen through the nose at a low flow) is the most commonly used method of oxygen administration, despite a lack of data regarding its safety and efficacy. Low birth weight infants are vulnerable to obstruction from secretions and blood, as well as the presence of the nasal cannula. Partially obstructed nostrils greatly increase the work of breathing. Additional potential adverse effects include an increased need for suctioning, increased risk for systemic infection, and inadvertent positive end expiratory pressure (CPAP). No study has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the nasal cannula compared to an oxygen hood (plastic "hood" that is placed over the infant's head to provide oxygen) on gas exchange or infection.
Among infants who require supplemental oxygen (by either a nasal cannula or an oxygen hood) for clinical indications, objectives the investigators hope to accomplish in a randomized blinded (investigator) trial:
Aim 1: To determine the short-term effect of different flows of oxygen by the nasal cannula on transcutaneous PCO2 (PTCO2).
Aim 2: To determine, once optimal flow is established in Aim 1, the effect of prolonged (one week) use of a nasal cannula compared to an oxygen hood on PTCO2.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
Procedure: nasal cannula oxygen delivery Procedure: supplemental oxygen delivery by hood |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Method of Oxygen Delivery (Comparison Nasal Cannula vs Oxygen Hood) and the Effect on Transcutaneous PaCO2 |
- Change in transcutaneous PaCO2
- Heart rate, respiratory rate, apnea, escalation in respiratory care (CPAP, mechanical ventilation, methylxanthines, diuretics, steroids), proven sepsis
| Estimated Enrollment: | 44 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2006 |
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | up to 6 Months |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants with an oxygen requirement (FiO2 of > 0.3 to maintain pulse oxygen saturations 85-95%)
- On the ventilator or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for > 1 week ready to be changed to nasal cannula
- Weight less than 2500 grams and < 1500 grams birth weight
Exclusion Criteria:
- Obvious chromosomal or congenital anomaly for craniofacial or respiratory system anomalies
- Known significant congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosus)
- Seizures or known neuromuscular disease
- Received steroids in week prior to eligibility
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| Memorial Hermann Children's Hospital | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Kathleen A Kennedy, MD, MPH | University of Texas at Houston Medical School |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00135252 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | Nasal cannula |
| Study First Received: | August 23, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | December 23, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston:
|
developing chronic lung disease |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Lung Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013