TeleQuit Smoking Cessation Program
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
TeleQuit is a group randomized trial testing whether a telephone care coordination program increases the rate of smoking cessation treatment for VA patients at study sites. We are testing whether proactive care coordination (counselor initiates the call to the patient) is more effective than reactive coordination (coordinator waits for the patient to call); and whether multi-session counseling is more effective than brief primary care-based counseling plus self-help materials. We randomly assigned study sites to either quitline counseling or brief counseling only. All patients receive brief smoking cessation counseling from their primary care physician, smoking cessation medications (once they are in contact with the VA care coordinator), and a follow-up call at 6 months. Care coordination will be provided by VA clinical staff. Intensive counseling is provided by the California Smokers' Helpline.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Smoking |
Procedure: Approach to proactive referral vs. reactive referral Procedure: Intensive telephone counseling vs. brief counseling |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Telephone Care Coordination to Improve Smoking Cessation Counseling |
- Abstinence from smoking and smoking cessation treatment rates. [ Time Frame: 6 month ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Counseling rates [ Time Frame: Short term ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 6000 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Arm 1 |
Procedure: Approach to proactive referral vs. reactive referral
Proactive referral vs. reactive referral
Procedure: Intensive telephone counseling vs. brief counseling
Multi session counseling vs brief counseling by referring provider
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- VA patient assigned to a clinic offering the program
- Smoker
- Patient wants to quit smoking
Exclusion Criteria:
None
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| VA Palo Alto Health Care System | |
| Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1290 | |
| VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda | |
| Sepulveda, California, United States, 91311 | |
| United States, New York | |
| New York, NY | |
| New York, New York, United States, 10010 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Scott E. Sherman, MD MPH | New York, NY |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Department of Veterans Affairs |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00123682 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IMV 04-088, PCC 2004-081176 |
| Study First Received: | July 21, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | April 18, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by Department of Veterans Affairs:
|
Smoking Cessation Care Management Substance Use Disorder QUERI |
Primary Care Regional Expansion Telephone |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Smoking Habits |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013