Carotid Stenting vs. Surgery of Severe Carotid Artery Disease and Stroke Prevention in Asymptomatic Patients (ACT I)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The study is being conducted to demonstrate the non-inferiority of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the Emboshield® Embolic Protection System with the Xact® Carotid Stent System to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of asymptomatic extracranial carotid atherosclerotic disease.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Carotid Artery Disease Carotid Stenosis Stroke Atherosclerosis |
Device: Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional) Procedure: Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical) |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label |
| Official Title: | Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Versus Endarterectomy in Asymptomatic Subjects Who Are at Standard Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy With Significant Extracranial Carotid Stenotic Disease (ACT I) |
- Occurrence of major adverse events 30 days following the procedure [ Time Frame: 0 to 365 days post procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Major adverse events = Composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction and death during the 30-day post-procedural period and ipsilateral strokes between 31 and 365 days post-procedure.
- Acute device success [ Time Frame: 0 to 30 days post procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Procedural success [ Time Frame: 0 to 30 days post procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Composite Morbidity Measure [ Time Frame: 0 to 30 Days Post-procedure ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Composite Morbidity Measure = Cranial and peripheral nerve injury (cranial/cervical, femoral, peroneal, or other), vascular injury (including CAS access artery injury), non-cerebral bleeding, hematoma, or pseudoaneurysm, CEA wound or access artery wound, general anesthesia/allergic reaction/airway complications.
- Freedom from clinically indicated target lesion revascularization [ Time Frame: at 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from clinically indicated target lesion revascularization [ Time Frame: at 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from ipsilateral stroke [ Time Frame: at 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from ipsilateral stroke [ Time Frame: at 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from ipsilateral stroke [ Time Frame: at 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from ipsilateral stroke [ Time Frame: at 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from mortality [ Time Frame: at 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from mortality [ Time Frame: at 2 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from mortality [ Time Frame: at 3 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from mortality [ Time Frame: at 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Freedom from mortality [ Time Frame: at 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 1665 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
CAS group: 3:1 ratio of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) versus Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA). Subjects will be followed at 30 days, six (6), and 12 months post-procedure, and annually for four (4) additional years. |
Device: Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
Carotid artery stenting with filter (interventional)
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
CEA group: 3:1 ratio of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) versus Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA). Subjects will be followed at 30 days, six (6), and 12 months post-procedure, and annually for four (4) additional years. |
Procedure: Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
Carotid artery endarterectomy (surgical)
|
Detailed Description:
Randomization for ACT 1 employs a 3:1 ratio of CAS versus CEA. A lead-in phase of up to 400 carotid stent subjects will provide investigators experience with the study devices prior to pivotal enrollment.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 79 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Severe carotid artery disease
- Patients who have not had symptoms related to their carotid artery disease in the last 180 days
- Patients who are able to undergo either an interventional stenting or surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have had symptoms in the last 180 days
- Patients who are high risk for surgery
- Patients who have certain conditions that might confound the results of the study
Contacts and Locations
Show 62 Study Locations| Principal Investigator: | Jon Matsumura, MD | University of Wisconsin, Madison |
| Principal Investigator: | Kenneth Rosenfield, MD | Massachusetts General Hospital |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Abbott Vascular |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00106938 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AVD-640-0052 |
| Study First Received: | April 1, 2005 |
| Last Updated: | April 4, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Abbott Vascular:
|
Carotid stenting Carotid endarterectomy Carotid artery disease with severe narrowing of the artery Stroke prevention |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atherosclerosis Carotid Artery Diseases Carotid Stenosis Stroke Cerebral Infarction Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Vascular Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013