AMG 162 in Bisphosphonate Naive Metastatic Breast Cancer

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00091832
First received: September 17, 2004
Last updated: December 9, 2010
Last verified: December 2010
  Purpose

This study is to evaluate various doses and schedules for AMG 162 administration and characterize the safety profile in this indication.


Condition Intervention Phase
Breast Cancer
Metastases
Bone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced Breast Cancer
Biological: AMG 162
Drug: IV Bisphosphonates
Phase 2

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: A Randomized Active-controlled Study of AMG 162 in Breast Cancer Subjects With Bone Metastasis Who Have Not Previously Been Treated With Bisphosphonate Therapy.

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by Amgen:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in uNTx/Cr [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Urinary N-telopeptide corrected by creatinine (uNTx/Cr). Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in uNTx [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Urinary N-telopeptide (uNTx). Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Achieving 65% or More Reduction in uNTx From Baseline at Week 13 [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Achieving a 65% reduction or more in uNTx from baseline at week 13. Calculation used is ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100 and subjects considered having 65% reduction or more if their value is <=-65%.

  • Achieving 65% or More Reduction in uNTX From Baseline at Week 25 [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Achieving a 65% reduction or more in uNTX from baseline at week 25. Calculation used is ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100 and subjects considered having 65% reduction or more if their value is <=-65%.

  • Time to 65% or More Reduction in uNTX From Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 57 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from enrollment to the 1st occurrence of a reduction of uNTx of ≥ 65% compared to baseline. For subjects whose uNTx does not go below 65% of the baseline value, the time is censored at time of last evaluation of uNTx.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Serum CTX [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Type I serum C-Telopeptide (CTX). Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in Serum CTX [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Type I serum C-Telopeptide (CTX). Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in P1NP [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP). Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in P1NP [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP). Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in TRAP5b [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b). Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in TRAP5b [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b). Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in BSAP [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP). Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in BSAP [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP). Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 13 in Osteocalcin [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 13 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline to week 13 calculated using ((week 13 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Percent Change From Baseline to Week 25 in Osteocalcin [ Time Frame: Baseline and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline to week 25 calculated using ((week 25 value - baseline value) / baseline value ) x 100.

  • Time to First Skeletal Related Event [ Time Frame: Day 1 and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Skeletal Related Event (SRE) defined as >=1 of the following: pathological bone fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation therapy to bone (including the use of radioisotopes).

  • Skeletal Related Event [ Time Frame: Day 1 and week 25 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Skeletal Related Event (SRE) defined as >=1 of the following: pathological bone fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation therapy to bone (including the use of radioisotopes).

  • Occurrence of Hypercalcemia [ Time Frame: Day 1 and week 57 ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
    Occurrence of hypercalcemia at grade 3 or 4 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3. A summary of hypercalcemia events is reported under adverse event.


Enrollment: 255
Study Start Date: September 2004
Study Completion Date: October 2006
Primary Completion Date: November 2005 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: 60 mg AMG 162, q12 weeks
60 mg AMG 162, q12 weeks
Biological: AMG 162
Subjects will be stratified by anti-neoplastic treatment (hormonal therapy vs. chemotherapy, if both are used treatment will be classified as chemotherapy) at the study entry and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (n=40/cohort). The AMG 162 cohorts will be blinded to the dose and schedule. The bisphosphonate arm will be open-label.
Experimental: 120 mg AMG 162 SC, q4 weeks
120 mg AMG 162 SC, q4 weeks
Biological: AMG 162
Subjects will be stratified by anti-neoplastic treatment (hormonal therapy vs. chemotherapy, if both are used treatment will be classified as chemotherapy) at the study entry and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (n=40/cohort). The AMG 162 cohorts will be blinded to the dose and schedule. The bisphosphonate arm will be open-label.
Experimental: 180 mg AMG 162 SC, q4 weeks
180 mg of AMG 162 given SC, q4 weeks
Biological: AMG 162
Subjects will be stratified by anti-neoplastic treatment (hormonal therapy vs. chemotherapy, if both are used treatment will be classified as chemotherapy) at the study entry and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (n=40/cohort). The AMG 162 cohorts will be blinded to the dose and schedule. The bisphosphonate arm will be open-label.
Active Comparator: IV bisphosphonates, q4 weeks
IV bisphosphonates, q4 weeks (active comparator)
Drug: IV Bisphosphonates
Approximately 40 subjects were enrolled in the open label bisphosphonate arm (administered per package insert).
Experimental: 180 mg AMG 162 SC, q12 weeks
180 mg AMG 162 SC, q12 weeks
Biological: AMG 162
Subjects will be stratified by anti-neoplastic treatment (hormonal therapy vs. chemotherapy, if both are used treatment will be classified as chemotherapy) at the study entry and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (n=40/cohort). The AMG 162 cohorts will be blinded to the dose and schedule. The bisphosphonate arm will be open-label.
Experimental: 30 mg AMG 162 SC. q4 weeks
dose of 30 mg AMG 162 given SC q4 weeks
Biological: AMG 162
Subjects will be stratified by anti-neoplastic treatment (hormonal therapy vs. chemotherapy, if both are used treatment will be classified as chemotherapy) at the study entry and randomized to 1 of 6 treatment arms (n=40/cohort). The AMG 162 cohorts will be blinded to the dose and schedule. The bisphosphonate arm will be open-label.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Confirmation of breast cancer - At least one bone metastasis

  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00091832

Sponsors and Collaborators
Amgen
Investigators
Study Director: MD Amgen
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Responsible Party: Global Development Leader, Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00091832     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 20040113
Study First Received: September 17, 2004
Results First Received: December 9, 2010
Last Updated: December 9, 2010
Health Authority: Australia: Human Research Ethics Committee
Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration
Austria: AGES - PharmaMed Austria Institut Wissenschaft & Information
Austria: Bundesamt fur Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen
Austria: Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen
Austria: Central Ethics Committee
Austria: Competant Authority
Austria: Secretariat of Health
Belgium: Directorate general for the protection of Public health: Medicines
Belgium: Directorate-General for Medicinal Products
Belgium: Federal Public Service (FPS) Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment
Belgium: FPS of Public Health, Food Chain Security and Environment
Belgium: Pharmaceutical Inspectorate
Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration
Canada: Health Canada
Canada: Health Products and Food Branch
Canada: Institutional Review Board
European Union: European Medicines Agency
France and Sweden: European Medicines Agency
France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)
France: CCPPRB Central Ethics Committee
France: Ministry of Health
Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
Italy: Local Ethics Committees
Italy: Ministry of Health
Mexico: COFEPRIS
Mexico: Ministry of Health
Belgium: Service Public Federal Sante Publiquest, Securite de la Chaine alimentaire et Environnement
Belgium: Service Public Fédéral Santé Publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne alimentaire et Environnement
Mexico: SSA (Secretaria de Salud Publica)
Portugal: National Institute of Pharmacy and Medicines
Spain: Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios
Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines
Spain: Spanish Drug Agency
United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
United States: Food and Drug Administration
United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by Amgen:
Breast Cancer
Cancer

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasms, Second Primary
Bone Neoplasms
Bone Marrow Diseases
Neoplasms by Site
Neoplasms
Breast Diseases
Skin Diseases
Neoplastic Processes
Pathologic Processes
Bone Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Hematologic Diseases
Diphosphonates
Bone Density Conservation Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Pharmacologic Actions

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013