Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Study NCT00080808   Information provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
First Received: April 7, 2004   Last Updated: October 31, 2009   History of Changes

April 7, 2004
October 31, 2009
August 2001
 
Potency rate at 2 years after surgery
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00080808 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Time to first spontaneous erection
  • Quality of nocturnal erection as objectively measured by the Rigiscan
Same as current
 
Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating the Importance of Early Erectile Dysfunction Rehabilitation and Unilateral Autologous Sural Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of erectile dysfunction rehabilitation and unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with vs without unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
  • Compare potency rates in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare erection quality in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare time to return of spontaneous erectile activity in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the feasibility of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare quality of life and sexual satisfaction in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare changes in penile erectile length and circumference in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the relative morbidity of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.

Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, patients undergo erectile dysfunction rehabilitation comprising any of the following: oral sildenafil (as occasion requires), use of vacuum erection device over 10 minutes once daily, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly, or MUSE (suppository in urethra for erections) therapy. Erectile dysfunction rehabilitation may continue for up to 2 years or until return of adequate spontaneous erectile activity.

  • Arm II: Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.

In both arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life and sexual history are assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and then every 4 months for 2 years or until return of spontaneous erectile activity.

Patients are followed every 4 months for 2 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 200 patients (120 for arm I and 80 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.

Phase II
Interventional
Supportive Care, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control
  • Perioperative/Postoperative Complications
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Sexual Dysfunction and Infertility
  • Sexuality and Reproductive Issues
  • Drug: alprostadil
  • Drug: papaverine
  • Drug: phentolamine mesylate
  • Drug: sildenafil citrate
  • Procedure: conventional surgery
 
Davis JW, Chang DW, Chevray P, Wang R, Shen Y, Wen S, Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Swanson DA, Madsen LT, Huber N, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ, Wood CG. Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1135-43. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
200
 
 

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    • T1-2, NX, M0 disease
  • Candidate for unilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy

    • Gleason score ≤ 7 in the cores on the side to be spared
  • No discernable preoperative erectile dysfunction, defined as the ability to have successful penetration on at least 75% of attempts

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 65 and under

Performance status

  • Not specified

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

Other

  • No peripheral neuropathy that would preclude procurement of a sural nerve graft
  • No significant psychiatric illness
  • No demonstrable vasculogenic source of impotence

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • Not specified

Endocrine therapy

  • No prior androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antiandrogens)

Radiotherapy

  • No prior pelvic irradiation

Surgery

  • See Disease Characteristics
Male
up to 65 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00080808
 
CDR0000355366, MDA-ID-01304
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Study Chair: Christopher G. Wood, MD M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
August 2006

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP