Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (FOCUS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare liberal red blood cell transfusion therapy with restrictive red blood cell transfusion therapy in surgical patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Anemia Hematologic Diseases Blood Transfusion Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Diseases Myocardial Infarction Thromboembolism Pneumonia Cerebrovascular Accident |
Biological: Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy Biological: Restrictive (Symptomatic) Transfusion Strategy |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS) |
- Ability to walk 10 feet or across a room without human assistance or death [ Time Frame: Measured 60 days after study entry ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or death for any reason [ Time Frame: In-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Postoperative complications (e.g., pneumonia, wound infection, thromboembolism, stroke) [ Time Frame: In hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Survival [ Time Frame: 30-daym, 60- day and long term up to 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Disposition status (i.e., nursing home placement) [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Function (e.g., lower extremity activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, fatigue/energy) [ Time Frame: 30 and 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Length of stay in hospital [ Time Frame: In-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Myocardial infarction [ Time Frame: In-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Composite outcomes (a) death, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia and b) death, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, thromboembolism and stroke) [ Time Frame: In-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 2016 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
Participants will undergo a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL.
|
Biological: Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
This transfusion strategy will maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL. This threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dL through hospital discharge or up to 30 days after randomization.
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Participants will undergo a symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia.
|
Biological: Restrictive (Symptomatic) Transfusion Strategy
Transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms from anemia (i.e., chest pain or ECG changes thought to be ischemic, congestive heart failure, unexplained tachycardia or hypotension unresponsive to fluids) or until the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL. Transfusion is permitted, but is not mandatory, if the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL.
|
Detailed Description:
BACKGROUND:
Red blood cell transfusions are an extremely common medical intervention in both the United States and worldwide; over 14 million units of blood are transfused in the United States. Between 60 and 70 percent of all blood is transfused in the surgical setting. Despite the common use of red blood cell transfusions, the threshold for transfusion has not been adequately evaluated and is very controversial. A decade ago, the standard of care was to administer a peri-operative transfusion whenever the hemoglobin (Hgb) level fell below 10 g/dl (the "10/30 rule"). Concerns about the safety of blood, especially with respect to HIV and hepatitis, and the absence of data to support a 10 g/dl threshold led to the current standard of care, which is to administer blood transfusions based on the presence of symptoms, and not a specific Hgb/hematocrit level. However, there have not been any randomized clinical trials done with surgical patients that have tested the efficacy and safety of withholding blood until the patient develops symptoms, or the "10/30" approach to transfusion. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk of adverse effects from reduced Hgb levels.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
This is a multi-center randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dl (liberal transfusion) in improving patient outcome. This will be compared to the restrictive (symptomatic) transfusion strategy in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia or Hgb less than 8 g/dL. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two transfusion strategies. The liberal (10 g/dl) threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dl through hospital discharge. Restrictive (Symptomatic) transfusion strategy patients will receive red blood cell transfusions for symptoms of anemia, although transfusion is also permitted, but not required, if the Hgb level falls below 8 g/dl. Outcomes will include functional recovery (primary outcome: ability to walk 10 feet across a room without human assistance or death 60 days post-randomization), lower extremity activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, survival up to 60-days and long-term, disposition (i.e., nursing home placement), and postoperative complications (e.g., myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or death in hospital, pneumonia, wound infection, thromboembolism, stroke).
Ambulation at 60 days is known to be highly predictive of ultimate functional outcome as well as of mortality at one year. Because inability to walk has such important implications for quality of life, and because it is a common problem, it far outweighs the small risk of viral infection or other complications from transfusion in elderly patients.
The trial will also evaluate the effect of transfusion threshold on postoperative risk of acute cardiac ischemia. The strategy will be to enhance surveillance for ischemic events by increasing the number of EKG and serum troponin measurements beyond those already called for in the original FOCUS protocol.
There is an ancillary study to the trial (R01 HL085706) to examine delirium as an outcome in a subsample of 139 patients. We will assess short-term (in hospital) and longer-term (after 30 days) severity of delirium.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Has undergone surgical repair for a hip fracture
- Has a postoperative Hgb level below 10 g/dL within three days of surgery
- Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral vascular disease) or cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, or creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to walk prior to hip fracture
- Declines blood transfusions
- Suffered multiple traumas
- Pathologic fracture of the hip due to malignancy
- Clinically recognized acute myocardial infarction within the 30 days prior to study entry
- Previously participated in the trial and fractured the other hip
- Symptoms associated with anemia (e.g., ischemic chest pain) or actively bleeding at the time of randomization
Contacts and Locations| United States, New Jersey | |
| University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ | |
| New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903 | |
| Study Chair: | Jeffrey L. Carson, MD | University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael Terrin | University of Maryland |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Jeffrey L. Carson, MD, University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00071032 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 159, U01 HL73958, U01 HL74815 |
| Study First Received: | October 9, 2003 |
| Last Updated: | May 2, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI):
|
Blood Disease blood transfusion |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Anemia Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Diseases Hematologic Diseases Infarction Myocardial Infarction Pneumonia Cerebral Infarction Stroke Thromboembolism Ischemia Pathologic Processes Necrosis |
Myocardial Ischemia Vascular Diseases Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Tract Infections Brain Infarction Brain Ischemia Cerebrovascular Disorders Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Embolism and Thrombosis Thrombosis |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013