Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (FOCUS)
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
First Received: October 9, 2003   Last Updated: March 30, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Information provided by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00071032
  Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare aggressive red blood cell transfusion therapy with conservative therapy in surgical patients with cardiovascular disease.


Condition Intervention Phase
Anemia
Hematologic Diseases
Blood Transfusion
Cardiovascular Diseases
Heart Diseases
Myocardial Infarction
Thromboembolism
Pneumonia
Cerebrovascular Accident
Procedure: Aggressive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy
Procedure: Symptomatic Transfusion Strategy
Phase III

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Official Title: Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS)

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI):

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Ability to walk 10 feet across a room without human assistance [ Time Frame: Measured 60 days after study entry ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Myocardial infarction or death [ Time Frame: in-hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Postoperative complications (e.g., pneumonia, thromboembolism, stroke) [ Time Frame: In hospital ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Survival [ Time Frame: 60 day and long term up to 5 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Nursing home placement [ Time Frame: 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Function (e.g., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, fatigue) [ Time Frame: 30 and 60 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 2016
Study Start Date: July 2003
Estimated Study Completion Date: November 2009
Estimated Primary Completion Date: April 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
1: Experimental
Participants will undergo a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL.
Procedure: Aggressive Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy
This transfusion strategy will maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL. This threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dL through hospital discharge or up to 30 days after randomization.
2: Active Comparator
Participants will undergo a symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia.
Procedure: Symptomatic Transfusion Strategy
Transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms from anemia (i.e., chest pain or ECG changes thought to be ischemic, congestive heart failure, unexplained tachycardia or hypotension unresponsive to fluids) or until the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL. Transfusion is permitted, but is not mandatory, if the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL.

Detailed Description:

BACKGROUND:

Red blood cell transfusions are an extremely common medical intervention in both the United States and worldwide; over 11 million units of blood are transfused in the United States. Between 60 and 70 percent of all blood is transfused in the surgical setting. Despite the common use of red blood cell transfusions, the threshold for transfusion has not been adequately evaluated and is very controversial. A decade ago, the standard of care was to administer a peri-operative transfusion whenever the hemoglobin (Hgb) level fell below 10 g/dl (the "10/30 rule"). Concerns about the safety of blood, especially with respect to HIV and hepatitis, and the absence of data to support a 10 g/dl threshold led to the current standard of care, which is to administer blood transfusions based on the presence of symptoms, and not a specific Hgb/hematocrit level. However, there have not been any randomized clinical trials done with surgical patients that have tested the efficacy and safety of withholding blood until the patient develops symptoms, or the "10/30" approach to transfusion. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk of adverse effects from reduced Hgb levels.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

This is a multi-center randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dl in improving patient outcome. This will be compared to the symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two transfusion strategies. The 10 g/dl threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dl through hospital discharge. Symptomatic transfusion strategy patients will receive red blood cell transfusions for symptoms of anemia, although transfusion is also permitted, but not required, if the Hgb level falls below 8 g/dl. Outcomes will include functional recovery (primary outcome: ability to walk 10 feet across a room without human assistance 60 days post-randomization), long-term survival, nursing home placement, and postoperative complications (e.g., death in hospital or within 30 days, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, thromboembolism, stroke). An estimated 2,600 patients from 25 centers will be randomized over a 3.5-year period. This will allow detection of a 16% relative risk reduction in the loss of ability to walk independently with a power of approximately 0.90. A pilot study conducted with 84 participants demonstrated the feasibility of the study.

Ambulation at 60 days is known to be highly predictive of ultimate functional outcome as well as of mortality at one year. Because inability to walk again has such important implications for quality of life, and because it is a common problem, it far outweighs the small risk of viral infection or other complications from transfusion in elderly patients. Also, this study will measure the frequency and 95% confidence intervals of the medical errors that are important in this patient population and are poorly documented in the literature. The medical errors that will be measured are the following: transfusion errors (e.g., blood transfusion to the wrong patient, mislabeling of samples for type and cross match, use of whole blood instead of packed red cells), failure to use thromboembolism prophylaxis, incorrect antibiotic prophylaxis, wrong site surgery, and femoral shaft fracture.

The trial will also evaluate the effect of transfusion threshold on postoperative risk of acute cardiac ischemia. The strategy will be to enhance surveillance for ischemic events by increasing the number of EKG and serum troponin measurements beyond those already called for in the original FOCUS protocol.

There is an ancillary study to the trial (R01 HL085706) to examine delirium as an outcome in a subsample of 200 patients. We will assess short-term (in hospital) and longer-term (after 30 days) severity of delirium.

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   50 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has undergone surgical repair for a hip fracture
  • Has a postoperative Hgb level below 10 g/dL within three days of surgery
  • Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral vascular disease) or cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, or creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to walk prior to hip fracture
  • Declines blood transfusions
  • Suffered multiple traumas
  • Pathologic fracture of the hip due to malignancy
  • Clinically recognized acute myocardial infarction within the 30 days prior to study entry
  • Previously participated in the trial and fractured the other hip
  • Symptoms associated with anemia (e.g., ischemic chest pain) or actively bleeding at the time of randomization
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00071032

Locations
United States, New Jersey
University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
Sponsors and Collaborators
Investigators
Study Chair: Jeffrey L. Carson, MD University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
Principal Investigator: Michael Terrin University of Maryland
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Responsible Party: University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ ( Jeffrey L. Carson, MD )
Study ID Numbers: 159, U01 HL73958, U01 HL74815
Study First Received: October 9, 2003
Last Updated: March 30, 2009
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00071032     History of Changes
Health Authority: United States: Federal Government

Keywords provided by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI):
Blood Disease

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Cerebral Infarction
Myocardial Ischemia
Brain Diseases
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Thromboembolism
Necrosis
Pathologic Processes
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Respiratory Tract Infections
Brain Ischemia
Cardiovascular Diseases
Myocardial Infarction
Heart Diseases
Hematologic Diseases
Stroke
Nervous System Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Ischemia
Thrombosis
Embolism and Thrombosis
Lung Diseases
Brain Infarction
Infarction
Pneumonia

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on November 05, 2009