Echinacea Versus Placebo Effect in Common Cold (Physician Echinacea Placebo) (PEP)
The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified November 2009 by University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
Sponsor:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Collaborators:
Information provided by:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00065715
First received: July 31, 2003
Last updated: November 19, 2009
Last verified: November 2009
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The design and interpretation of randomized trials is intimately connected to the use of "placebo". The nature and magnitude of placebo effects, however, is very poorly understood. This study will assess and compare placebo effects and physician interaction effects within a community-acquired common cold model. The goal of this study is to assess two kinds of placebo affects and how physician interaction effects;
- The effect of receiving blinded placebo, compared to no treatment; and
- The effect of receiving open-label active Echinacea treatment compared to blinded active treatment.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Common Cold |
Dietary Supplement: Echinacea Other: Blinded placebo |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Placebo: Physician or Pill? A Randomized Trial in a Common Cold Model Funded by NIH NCCAM Under RFA "The Placebo Effect in Clinical Practice" |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
Common Cold
Drug Information available for:
Echinacea
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Duration and severity of illness, as assessed by the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-21) [ Time Frame: twice daily during illness ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- SF-8 general health-related quality of life [ Time Frame: daily during illness ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- perceived stress PSS-4 [ Time Frame: daily during illness ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- optimism LOT [ Time Frame: two days after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- patient satisfaction CARE [ Time Frame: after doctor patient interaction ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- feeling thermometer - EuroQol VAS [ Time Frame: daily during illness ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- IL-8 (inflammatory cytokine)from nasal wash [ Time Frame: 2 days after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- neutrophil count from nasal wash [ Time Frame: two days after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 720 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2009 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | October 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: A
No pills
|
|
|
Placebo Comparator: B
Blinded placebo
|
Other: Blinded placebo
Blinded placebo - Coated tablet
|
|
Experimental: C
Echinacea - Blinded
|
Dietary Supplement: Echinacea
Echinacea phytochemical profile Each tablet is comprised of the equivalent of 1275 mg of echinacea root, as follows: A) Echinacea purpurea - 675 mg root yields 112.5 mg dried extract, standardized to contain 2.1mg alkamides. B) Echinacea angustifolia - 600 mg root yields 150 mg dried extract, standardized to contain 2.0 mg alkamides. Each batch of tablets is analyzed by Reversed Phase - High Peformance Liquid Chromatography to determine the levels of alkamides and caffeic derivatives present. Caffeic acid derivative levels are typically as follows: caftaric acid = 0.5 to 2.0 mg/tablet; cichoric acid = 3.4 to 8.5 mg/tablet; chlorogenic acid = < 0.5 mg/tablet; dicaffeoyl quinic acids (including cynarin) = 0.7 to 2.0 mg/tablet; echinacoside = 1.0 to 1.7 mg/tablet
|
|
Experimental: D
Echinacea - Unblinded, Open Label
|
Dietary Supplement: Echinacea
Echinacea phytochemical profile Each tablet is comprised of the equivalent of 1275 mg of echinacea root, as follows: A) Echinacea purpurea - 675 mg root yields 112.5 mg dried extract, standardized to contain 2.1mg alkamides. B) Echinacea angustifolia - 600 mg root yields 150 mg dried extract, standardized to contain 2.0 mg alkamides. Each batch of tablets is analyzed by Reversed Phase - High Peformance Liquid Chromatography to determine the levels of alkamides and caffeic derivatives present. Caffeic acid derivative levels are typically as follows: caftaric acid = 0.5 to 2.0 mg/tablet; cichoric acid = 3.4 to 8.5 mg/tablet; chlorogenic acid = < 0.5 mg/tablet; dicaffeoyl quinic acids (including cynarin) = 0.7 to 2.0 mg/tablet; echinacoside = 1.0 to 1.7 mg/tablet
|
Detailed Description:
As per Brief Summary
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Suspected or known cold
- At least one of the following cold symptoms:
nasal discharge, nasal congestion, sneezing, or sore throat
- Enrolled in school, for children 12 to 17 years of age
Exclusion criteria:
- Pregnancy;
- Symptom duration > 36 hrs
- Concurrent use of antibiotics, antivirals, nasal steroids, decongestants or antihistamines;
- Anticipated need for symptom-relieving meds during cold
- Autoimmune/deficiency disease
- History of allergic rhinitis with current eye itching/sneezing
- History of asthma w/current cough/SOB
- Prior study entry
- Allergy to Echinacea
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00065715
Locations
| United States, Wisconsin | |
| University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Family Medicine | |
| Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53706-1490 | |
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Bruce Barrett, MD PhD | University of Wisconsin, Madison |
More Information
Additional Information:
Related Info 
No publications provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Bruce Barrett MD PhD, University of Wisconsin |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00065715 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | R01 AT001428, R01AT001428, BarrettB |
| Study First Received: | July 31, 2003 |
| Last Updated: | November 19, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by University of Wisconsin, Madison:
|
head cold common cold echinacea placebo |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Common Cold Respiratory Tract Infections Picornaviridae Infections RNA Virus Infections |
Virus Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Infection |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013