Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Benefits and Risks of Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00014950   Information provided by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
First Received: April 14, 2001   Last Updated: June 23, 2005   History of Changes

April 14, 2001
June 23, 2005
 
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00014950 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Benefits and Risks of Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
Pulmonary Benefits of Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening

Although cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common, life-threatening autosomal recessive genetic disorder of the white population, there are often delays in diagnosis and hence start of treatment. Advances of the past two decades have made CF screening feasible using routinely collected neonatal blood specimens and measuring an enzyme level followed by CF mutation DNA analysis. Our overall goal of the study is to see if early diagnosis of CF through neonatal screening will be medically beneficial without major risks. ''Medically beneficial'' refers to better nutrition and/or pulmonary status, whereas '' risks'' include laboratory errors, miscommunication or misunderstanding, and adverse psychosocial consequences. Specific aims include assessment of the benefits, risks, costs, quality of life, and cognitive function associated with CF neonatal screening and a better understanding of the epidemiology of CF.

A comprehensive, randomized clinical trial emphasizing early diagnosis as the key variable has been underway since 1985. Nutritional status has been assessed using height and weight measurements and biochemical methods. The results have demonstrated significant benefits in the screened (early diagnosis) group. We are now focusing on the effect of early diagnosis of CF on pulmonary outcome. Pulmonary status is measured using chest radiographs, chest scans using high resolution computerized tomography, and pulmonary function tests. Other factors that we are looking at include risk factors for the acquisition of respiratory pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, quality of life and cognitive function of children with CF who underwent early versus delayed diagnosis, as well as the cost effectiveness of screening and the costs of diagnosis and treatment of CF throughout childhood.

If the questions underlying this study are answered favorably, it is likely that neonatal screening using a combination of enzyme level (immunoreactive trypsinogen) and DNA test will become the routine method for identifying new cases of CF not only in the State of Wisconsin, but throughout the country.

 
 
Interventional
Diagnostic, Randomized, Single Group Assignment
  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Lung Disease
  • Pseudomonas Infections
Procedure: CF newborn screening
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
 
 
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have been born in the State of Wisconsin
  • Must have been born between April 15, 1985 and June 30, 1994
  • Must have had a valid newborn screening test for cystic fibrosis in the first 28 days of life.
  • Must have a sweat chloride test greater or equal to 60 mmol/Liter
  • Parental consent
Both
1 Month to 21 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
NCT00014950
 
Farrell, RO1DK34108, GCRC
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
Principal Investigator: Philip M. Farrell, MD, PhD Dean University of Wisconsin Medical School
Investigator: Michael J. Rock, M.D. Dept. Pediatrics, UW Hospital
Investigator: Mark Splaingard Children's Hospital and Health System Foundation, Wisconsin
Investigator: Anita Laxova Dept. Pediatrics, UW Madison
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
October 2003

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP