17 studies found for: Open Studies | "Uterine Prolapse"
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Uterine Prolapse Stage III
Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment During Vaginal Repair
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
Effect of Salpingectomy During Conservative Hysterectomy
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Apical Prolapse Stage III-IV
Delivery Method and Risk for Urogenital Prolapse 15-20 Years Later
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
Will Cleaning the Bowel With an Enema Before Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Prevent Complications?
Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
|15||Not yet recruiting||
Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
|16||Not yet recruiting||
Exair® Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
† Indicates status has not been verified in more than two years